-
• #13677
What the hell is up with that photo, why would anyone deliberately pose their bike ins such a stupid fashion.
Kids these days! -
• #13678
and while we're at it, what's going on with the single toeclip..?
-
• #13679
the ugliest I have seen is the small one with 650 front so that the geo is not compact
-
• #13680
That I came for the NJS but stayed for the dales?
you know what I mean rekordeling!
-
• #13681
super salve potential in this tfg frame
-
• #13682
-
• #13683
Choped saddle? 0_o
No, but older than this forum.
-
• #13684
not that hard, given the frame was made in 92 and 93.
-
• #13685
The picture is, posted from day 1 here.
-
• #13686
u sure 'bout that? I remember when dildo bars came out
-
• #13687
Yes, I am.
-
• #13688
http://www.lfgss.com/thread3404.html#Item_20
them bars came out in 2008
-
• #13689
forget it I am sure you are right
-
• #13690
-
• #13691
Probably get away with posting that in porn > > > > > > >
-
• #13692
^^Not all that slavey to me. very nice though
-
• #13693
readers wifey
-
• #13694
Is the toptube sloping up or is it the angle?
-
• #13695
Bejeezus, how tall are you?
-
• #13696
yeah its semi compact and im 6 foot 4
-
• #13697
to put things in perspective thats a 53t chainring and 170mm cranks
-
• #13698
yeah it slopes. Would sell too well to have 300GBP frame sloping downwards
-
• #13699
Oh, not that big then. That frame looks absolutely massive.
-
• #13700
yeah it slopes. Would sell too well to have 300GBP frame sloping downwards
I know right, I might just design my own, find a manufacturer and market it
That is nowhere near the ugliest dale track. This is:
well, ok. I'll have to admit the current version is not that awful:
http://www.pedalroom.com/p/cannondale-track-hawaii-4237_29.jpg