-
• #827
So what should I do with my Japanese bonds then?
trade them in for njs while they are still worth something
the Economy & Banks threadthe Trading and Investment Strategies thread?!
-
• #828
japans debt crossed the 15 zero threshold !
thats 1,000,000,000,000,000 JPY ... 1 quadrillion ... 1 thousand trillioncrazy country eh!
This represents about $10.5 trillion, is an amount larger than the economies of Germany, France and the U.K. combined, and is about 230% of Japan's GDP although at this point who cares: Japan will never repay its debt and the best it can hope for is to inflate it away
i'm unconcerned by it all though,
-
• #829
All I could think of was - 'would this make it cheaper or more expensive to visit Tokyo?'. gave up on answering it almost straight away.
-
• #830
soooo many factors
but almost certainly cheaper .... i mean more expensive, sorry
-
• #831
Hold on - I have a of this Japan situation....
-
• #832
just finding it....here it is
-
• #833
-
• #834
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-18/jpmorgan-selling-building-houses-its-gold-vault
Worth a read to the end
-
• #835
Ugh, bloody banks!
-
• #836
May be time for a trip to India....
-
• #837
-
• #838
'Because shut up, that's why.'
-
• #840
nice infographic
-
• #841
nice infographic
so the people of Kenya pay a very high price for their political representatives!
is it value for money?!
the people of that country think not!
.. and it looks like their protest was effective,
[
Lawmakers in Kenya have agreed to rescind a planned salary hike, following outrage and protests by the public weary of politicians who already earn exorbitant wages in an impoverished country with an estimated 50 percent unemployment rate.
](http://www.ibtimes.com/kenyan-mps-agree-cut-their-salaries-sort-1306339) -
• #842
my thought for the evening:
would there be any reason not to have a law in this country banning the foreign ownership of UK property (land, housing, business premises etc.)?
premise: any inflow of money from abroad to buy up property is purely speculative: to extract rent, which is of no use to people actually living in this country, thereby needing shelter and possibly a space to start a small business (!)*;
e.g. a new-build residential block of flats in London
- the law of the land could state that this property can only be sold to existing residents of the land (citizens of the United Kingdom)
or the law of the land (as it does at present) could allow a 'foreign investor' to buy that property, then rent it out to tenants, extracting a rent from the tenant, and pushing up the price of housing as there is more willing purchasers ('Demand') due to the law allowing that property to be sold to foreign purchasers
and possibly of no use either to the people living in the land where the money has come from - lets say China - as instead of that money being reinvested in the local economy, its being withdrawn from that economy to be placed into another
reference: recall Nicholas Shaxson making a similar (or the same) argument in Treasure Islands ('Tax Havens and the Men who Stole the World')
- the law of the land could state that this property can only be sold to existing residents of the land (citizens of the United Kingdom)
-
• #843
So what would stop forrins creating a Real Estate company in the UK and using that UK entity to purchase property.
-
• #844
Nothing.
-
• #845
Punitive taxation on foreign owned real estate companies?
-
• #846
premise: any inflow of money from abroad to buy up property is purely speculative: to extract rent, which is of no use to people actually living in this country
In that case, your whole premise is wrong.
I brought money into this country and bought the property I currently live in, paying various taxes as well as the wages of IFAs, solicitors, house inspectors, electricians and others along the way.
It's not all Lambo-driving Arabs, buying £million mansions you know.
-
• #847
Punitive taxation on foreign owned real estate companies?
Then you just buy through a UK-owned company.
For every law they make, there's a loop-hole. -
• #848
So you are saying that government of the UK should enact laws for the benefit of the people of the UK, even if that means upsetting very rich foreigners? What on earth will your next insane idea be?
If it wasn't for foreigners and their money I wonder what Brits would being doing now..
-
• #849
still ruling the world like in the 1800's .. probably
-
• #850
Did somebody say "slaves"?
or just cut them into ample sized sheets and leave them by the toilet