-
• #427
Why isn't this in here?
66 c-t (I think? Anyway QUITE big) -
• #428
Needs spacer above stem.
-
• #429
66 is correct :P
Steerer was cut more by chance than measurement, may shorten a tad to slamdatstem but I'm finding the setup reeeeally good
-
• #430
How tall are you!?
-
• #431
6'5" :)
-
• #432
So am I and I ride a 61cm, you must have some long ass legs!
-
• #433
or your bike is too small!
I have ridden 60 (twice), 61 effective, 62, 64 (twice) and this.
This is best fit so far.
-
• #434
i ride a 61(?)cm bowery, with a shiz load of seatpost showing.
i'd love a 65cm+ frame, but struggling to find one.
(I'm 6'5"/6'6" BTW) -
• #435
Readers wives
-
• #436
-
• #437
Hawt.
-
• #439
If someone would like to buy me this I would be very grateful
-
• #440
-
• #441
It's tiny.
-
• #442
-
• #443
Bit of a weight weenie build with all tha KCNC scandium stuff, shame about the American Classics those logos are ugly!
-
• #444
Yep its 6.9 kgs as seen which isn't too bad for the size and wheel depth. The wheel decals are definitely divisive though, you're not the first to dislike them but others really take to them! They're un-dimpled 404 rims under the decals so I may yet de-badge them. Anyway they were £400 for the pair in mint condition so I'm not complaining. I've got some R-Sys on the way too though so it'll be nice to make the comparison with them and should take me to 6.8kgs
-
• #445
-
• #446
that is so nice. want want
-
• #447
-
• #448
-
• #449
Whenever I see that Kelly, I always end up saying to myself - "that could really use another tube somewhere".
And where the hell is there a picture of the owner?
-
• #450
Just to fuck you all off