BBBs - Big Beautiful Bikes

Posted on
Page
of 47
  • Just to fuck you all off

  • Why isn't this in here?

    66 c-t (I think? Anyway QUITE big)

  • Needs spacer above stem.

  • 66 is correct :P

    Steerer was cut more by chance than measurement, may shorten a tad to slamdatstem but I'm finding the setup reeeeally good

  • How tall are you!?

  • 6'5" :)

  • So am I and I ride a 61cm, you must have some long ass legs!

  • or your bike is too small!

    I have ridden 60 (twice), 61 effective, 62, 64 (twice) and this.

    This is best fit so far.

  • i ride a 61(?)cm bowery, with a shiz load of seatpost showing.
    i'd love a 65cm+ frame, but struggling to find one.
    (I'm 6'5"/6'6" BTW)

  • Readers wives

  • Hawt.

  • all of this guys bikes, E.G.

  • It's tiny.

  • Rotwild R.S2 XL

    I've also got a 60cm Horace Bates frame sat in my parents garage that's waiting to be restored. Can't afford the paint job it deserves yet though.

  • Bit of a weight weenie build with all tha KCNC scandium stuff, shame about the American Classics those logos are ugly!

  • Yep its 6.9 kgs as seen which isn't too bad for the size and wheel depth. The wheel decals are definitely divisive though, you're not the first to dislike them but others really take to them! They're un-dimpled 404 rims under the decals so I may yet de-badge them. Anyway they were £400 for the pair in mint condition so I'm not complaining. I've got some R-Sys on the way too though so it'll be nice to make the comparison with them and should take me to 6.8kgs

  • that is so nice. want want

  • Whenever I see that Kelly, I always end up saying to myself - "that could really use another tube somewhere".

    And where the hell is there a picture of the owner?

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

BBBs - Big Beautiful Bikes

Posted by Avatar for TM @TM

Actions