-
• #27
works o.k. latest osx/firefox.
not a fan of the white on grey though. is the type bigger?Type is now default size for your browser, whereas before it was hard-coded smaller to cope with Windows fonts literally years ago.
-
• #28
i likey
-
• #29
huh??
-
• #30
It smells kinda funny.
-
• #31
Make it go away!
-
• #32
Testing on Mac Safari.
All looks fine except,
The post actions (rep, report, quote, etc) are butted right up against the bottom border.
Add to rep opens a new tab rather than a floating box.
The first two page numbers are butting togetherSome of the HTML is unnecessary and only adds to page weight, and some is invalid. You can make it a lot cleaner.
- really? That's been obsolete for years. The name attribute is invalid on the element. If you're wanting to make something link to an in-page anchor (Back to top) then link it to an element's ID.
And you have loads of
elements doing nothing except putting borders on the top and bottom of the , which should just be css borders on theand
elements with classnames like "big" when you could be applying styles based on them being inside the
element. -
• #33
Argh! My eyes!
-
• #34
I like it, but I miss the search box on the top right, where's that gone?
-
• #35
and new posts at the bottom
-
• #36
make it go away!!!!
-
• #37
I miss the little symbols on the left of the threads showing how many posts they have/if you've posted in it.
-
• #38
It's pretty messy in a lot of places. Can I have the old one back until you're finished?
-
• #39
Ah, I see your styleid.
-
• #40
I think its contagious.
The old style spy has orange things in it today. Orange!
-
• #41
Trying to figure out which style is less conspicuous at my desk at work. That's all that really matters to me.
-
• #42
Type is now default size for your browser, whereas before it was hard-coded smaller to cope with Windows fonts literally years ago.
It's huge though. Can you make it 80% or something?
You only see one post on a netbook. -
• #43
The old one is more suited to my new stealth browsing habits.
-
• #44
Still, once the new HTML is finalised you could in theory have user selectable styles by just changing the CSS.
-
• #45
I like it, but I miss the search box on the top right, where's that gone?
I haven't coded it yet... it will return.
-
• #46
It's pretty messy in a lot of places. Can I have the old one back until you're finished?
Just use the old one and ignore this... linky in the first post of this thread will get you back.
-
• #47
It's huge though. Can you make it 80% or something?
You only see one post on a netbook.Tough, that's 100% font size for a browser, and it's only a hint... actual font-size is determined by the browser itself. Adjust the font-size in your browser options.
-
• #48
Oh my god that was horrible, thought I'd be stuck in that dark room forever. Couldn't find this thread to link back to old style. Please don't make it happen again, I implore you!
-
• #49
Not sure about the grey, but maybe that will change.
One thing that doesn't look great are the lines dividing the posts. I don't really know what to suggest - a bit more space maybe?
Also I think that the new style quotes are harder to read.
-
• #50
Ok. I've decided I really don't like the grey. It looks like one of those sketchy underground websites, and I find it hard on my eyes.
Maybe make it more like Bike Radar.
It still has "Today's" for guests... and yup more registered members use "New" than "Today's".
All navigation is still in the footer... anything you can't see is probably down there.