-
• #52
The underlying premise of this post is- chill the fuck out, step away from abusing the keyboard here
Prancer
Join Date
8th December 2010
Total Posts
115 -
• #53
I know it's James but still...
-
• #54
Hang on a mo. I'm just google imaging a mature hallibut, galvanised bucket, and 0.5 calibre Browning...
-
• #55
LFGSS is about watching this and laughing about it;
Literal LOL
-
• #56
Ed, what the fuck is with your current obsession with scatological porn?
It has become his joke du jour, but employing it in such a scat-ergun fashion will kill its effectiveness.
-
• #57
so the forum moderators are away and the wankers come right out to play. and we now have a thread in the general section about track bars which features a picture of a woman covered in shit.
you're an immature, thoughtless wanker, edscoble, and you should take a big break from the forum as it's clear you've had a few people kiss your ass on here, you've got yourself your own thread about all the delightful tripe you come out with, and it's gone to your head.
About this marvellously sophisticated name-play joke that keeps occurring to the point where the brainless few now think it passes as a forum in-joke: take stock and realise you are tricking people who are here to discuss bikes into looking at pornography that involves a woman eating and covering herself in shit. Despite your fascination with it and your resulting childish point-and-laugh at it, an awful lot of people who haven't a natural inclination towards it as a fetish find it totally shocking and offensive, not something to snigger at.
Added to that, it is entirely possible that someone could lose their job as a result of that appearing on their work screen. Have you ever worked in the world of office based companies Ed? They have their own HR departments and allsorts, you'd be amazed at the stringent clauses they put into contracts about viewing pornography at work.
So why are you being a stupid, cheap and disrespectful twat about it? You think Velocio wants the site he has spent so much time building up to be associated with pictures of women smeared in shit?
Get a handle on when something is inappropriate. And yes, I'm fully aware who started the joke. And yes, if you backtrack on this thread to find out what I'm going on about, you'll find something NFSW.
-
• #58
well said
-
• #59
Ed WTF is up with you? You did this in bike p*rn and totally overegged it there. STOP
-
• #60
Valid point, Phil, but... Are you at work, guys? Do your fucking work then.
-
• #61
what, a browse on your lunch hour isn't okay?
in any case, the work aspect is an aside EEI. disregard it if you want to.
-
• #62
Are you at work, guys? Do your fucking work then.
^This.
A few noobs might be shocked, but nobody who has been here any length of time has a right to expect everything here to be SFW. Some fora have scripts to bowdlerise the language, and you're welcome there if LFGSS is too strong for you.
Yes, Ed has used the gag to the point of tedium, but that is obvious without the need for a diatribe from Jimjams, so I suspect his fake outrage is driven more by egotism than any concern either for the sensibilities or the reputation of the forum.
-
• #63
unlike you mitre tester, not everything i post on here is driven by my ego. just because you're still smarting from the drubbing i gave you a few days ago for being a thoroughly unpleasant person on this forum doesn't mean you have to try and discredit the motives i had for what I posted earlier. disagree by all means, but please.. save your sniping for someone who'll be duped.
then again i remember you announced your arrival on the forum with a thread about what men's cocks looked like under lycra, and i made my feelings known then too, so i'm not surprised this sort of thing has you reaching eagerly for your keyboard. But in any case I've a feeling more people would prefer not to see pictures of a woman covered in human excrement on this cycling forum than are happy with it. just a hunch.
-
• #64
I don't remember agreeing to view extreme pornography without warning, is it in the T&Cs? I would prefer not to if that's OK.
-
• #65
Calm down, it's only chocolate.
Isn't it.
-
• #66
That chocolate made me very angry too!
-
• #68
Never mind Veronica Moser... have you seen what he posts in Bike Porn?
shudders
-
• #69
so the forum moderators are away and the wankers come right out to play. and we now have a thread in the general section about track bars which features a picture of a woman covered in shit.[quote]
Wouldn't it be easier to just says I overegged it and mention the SFW aspectvof it rather than writing a tl:dr post about it? I'd had listened and I did as that was the last time I've mentioned such person.
I hasn't taken the SFW implication in consideration so I do apologise for that.
It's very odd coming from a bloke who sparingly appear on the forum every now and then to have a says rather than contributing? You used to be a regular who have some good point to said.
[QUOTE=pajamas;1831499]
you're an immature, thoughtless wanker, edscoble, and you should take a big break from the forum as it's clear you've had a few people kiss your ass on here, you've got yourself your own thread about all the delightful tripe you come out with, and it's gone to your head.I had put that stupid topic on ignore and it's the first topic I've ignored on the forum, it's very irritating and bothering reading comment about my poor used of English, so I ignored it, it work at school, it work for me here, so fuck off with your implicating that I'm 'loving' it.
-
• #70
I don't remember agreeing to view extreme pornography without warning, is it in the T&Cs? I would prefer not to if that's OK.
I'm pretty sure Ed didn't hot link any images of extreme porn. Or did he?
-
• #71
I'm pretty sure Ed didn't hot link any images of extreme porn. Or did he?
That's what puzzles me unless posts have been edited: he suggested someone Google Veronica Moser but did not tell him it would be NSFW which was a faux pas. But the other guy then goes and posts a large pic of her and as far as I can see no one has asked him to delete it (though I now have in a PM).
-
• #72
Orange 3G internet thingy classes this site(LFGSS) as 'adult'
which is a right fucker, cos there is no way I'm asking for that filter to be lifted. -
• #73
NSFW: Not Safe For Work
NSFW: Not Safe For Wanking -
• #74
Very good points, pajamas. Maybe one day you'll have your own thread just like edscoble.
-
• #75
Am I missing something? If I image search for VM on google.co.uk on default settings, there is little to offend on page 1. So, people would have deliberately to have turned off safe search to see the offending material. The results of a web search are so obviously going to lead to potentially offensive material that only somebody deliberately seeking to be offended (or somebody who shares Ed's scat fetish) would actually click through to any of the results. The image posted is essentially indistinguishable from an image of somebody getting a mud pack at the spa without the contextual knowledge of VM's career.
Seems like a lot of unnecessary fuss about a slightly tired old joke from somebody trying to hold himself up as the forum's great crusader against political incorrectness.
ahh, but I'm abusing ed.
which is fine. and fun.