-
• #602
The well has been poisoned already (and I will accept some of the blame for that). All communication re: the BFF polo tournament should take place in person from now on (Max, Brendan, and my meeting yesterday made this abundantly clear). Some people love a good internet fight too much (again, I will accept some of the blame for that).
In all honestly, I think those people who have issues which have not been resolved should get in touch with Jon and try to organize a tete-a-tete (or tete-a-tetes).
Polo peas and all that.
-
• #603
Don't worry, The Pope is in town, he'll fix everything. http://twitpic.com/2ookih
-
• #604
^ ha!!
-
• #605
People are passionate about polo... it's not a bad thing.
-
• #606
People are passionate about polo... it's not a bad thing.
+1
Re. my comments and feelings, I've not intended to imply anyones been a dick...so sorry if anyone thinks that. I was just expressing my opinion about changing a fundamental playing rule...guess only because I'm protective and passionate in my own way about what polo has become to me and how i play within the current rules. I guess, if the 'world' of people were to revert against some of the current rules, I'd have to play along in the end.
I was also all in for the mix up team idea (ive got an awesome one after all ;-0 ) but i was just sticking up for a minority where the 'never played together' rule was being enforced a bit too hard ie not allowing DT and Sarah to play together is a bit of shame...its not a big deal to any of us if they did play, but to them esp Sarah, it means the polo world!
Anyway...enough going over old ground...sure the organizers will do whats best at the end of the day.
-
• #607
for real? will this be excepted?
#seriousquestionThat hockey tape is stronger than Max's welding..
-
• #608
ha!
-
• #609
Fuck i wish i had time to read the thread!!
-
• #610
Looks like London Bike Polo history is being written
-
• #611
Pas de chatons dans la thread, Yorgo. C'est pas important.
-
• #612
Anyway new team:
- Inventors of Bike Polo
Player 1: The Inventor
Player 2: TBC
Player 3: TBC -
• #613
.....but i was just sticking up for a minority where the 'never played together' rule was being enforced a bit too hard ie not allowing DT and Sarah to play together is a bit of shame...its not a big deal to any of us if they did play, but to them esp Sarah, it means the polo world!
aww! that is really sweet :) :)
-
• #614
Anyway new team:
- Inventors of Bike Polo
Player 1: The Inventor
Player 2: TBC
Player 3: TBC
Denied.
As the inventor you've played with everyone in spirit. At every game that's ever been played. Even with your the opposition in games that you've actually played in. -
• #615
^^^ Two complete noobs?
-
• #616
Denied.
As the inventor you've played with everyone in spirit. At every game that's ever been played. Even with your the opposition in games that you've actually played in.OK then
The Ambassadors of Bike Polo
Player 1: His Highness The Ambassador
Player 2: The High Commissioner (TBC)
Player 3: The Plenipotentiary Chief Of Bureau (TBC) -
• #617
Denied.
As the inventor you've played with everyone in spirit. At every game that's ever been played. Even with your the opposition in games that you've actually played in.Ha!
Great call, Em. Outstanding!
-
• #618
Team :
Luis (Apologie)
Marmouzou ( MGM )
Mirek (Netto) -
• #619
That's a team right there!
-
• #620
That's a team right there!
Gold star for observation!
-
• #621
wahoo, finally
-
• #622
It's a sarcastic Gold Star.
-
• #623
It's a sarcastic Gold Star.
Made out of pure FeS2.
-
• #624
Wheres all the monkeys?
Can I just say that in a thread already groaning under the weight of polemic, rhetoric, dodgy logic etc, your post makes a fine addition?
Or am I just poisoning the atmosphere?