-
• #6252
http://www.lfgss.com/thread80575.html#post2714484
Another one for this thread http://www.lfgss.com/thread50502.html please.
le merge
-
• #6253
http://www.lfgss.com/thread65526.html
http://www.lfgss.com/thread78517.html
Can someone please take the prices off the titles of these threads? And correct the spelling of snowboard? Ta!cabbages
-
• #6254
http://www.lfgss.com/thread80696.html#post2719355
into AQA or drivetrain thread....
merged
-
• #6255
Maybe this one too while you're at it?
-
• #6256
and done.
-
• #6257
Apostrophe fail
-
• #6258
http://www.lfgss.com/thread80647.html#post2717620
into
http://www.lfgss.com/thread31750-8.html#post2716334ta
coud this not be merged. otherwise I'd have no idea how to find the images I'd need, the thread was created so I wouldn't have to trawl through the mass of pages of bike porn to find the specific images/bikes/people required.
So to merge it back into bike porn seems a bit perverse.
-
• #6259
Smerged
-
• #6260
.
-
• #6261
got a google chrome 'something's not right here' page when clicking through to the epic win thread. dodgy content from afrojacks.com, apparently.
-
• #6262
but can't repeat it. ah well.
-
• #6263
Getting this when i click on the Epic Win thread
Warning: Something's Not Right Here!
www.lfgss.com contains content from afrojacks.com, a site known to distribute malware. Your computer might catch a virus if you visit this site.
Google has found malicious software may be installed onto your computer if you proceed. If you've visited this site in the past or you trust this site, it's possible that it has just recently been compromised by a hacker. You should not proceed, and perhaps try again tomorrow or go somewhere else.
We have already notified afrojacks.com that we found malware on the site. For more about the problems found on afrojacks.com, visit the Google Safe Browsing diagnostic page. -
• #6264
Yeah, found it on page 1.
An image was linked to that was on that domain. I've turned the image into a hyperlink and it solves it.
-
• #6265
Could I kindly ask you to change the title of this thread:
http://www.lfgss.com/thread80651.html
From
'2x free brake calipers, cheap D-lock, cheap(ish) road wheelset'to
'Carradice courier bag, cheap D-lock, cheap(ish) road wheelset, pinhead skewer'to more accurately reflect what I am now selling and what has been sold.
Ta
-
• #6266
Done
-
• #6267
Can this thread title be changed to include the word 'pothole'?
-
• #6268
Done
Appreciated, thanks.
-
• #6269
https://www.lfgss.com/post2723331-57528.html
would be more appropriate here http://www.lfgss.com/thread740.html, rather than current projects.
-
• #6270
http://www.lfgss.com/member30793.html
Blatant nursery evader. I wonder what thread he wants to start after he gets his 3 posts out the way?
-
• #6271
https://www.lfgss.com/thread80779.html
advertised elsewhere.
-
• #6272
coud this not be merged. otherwise I'd have no idea how to find the images I'd need, the thread was created so I wouldn't have to trawl through the mass of pages of bike porn to find the specific images/bikes/people required.
So to merge it back into bike porn seems a bit perverse.
There is no unmerge function.
A post only knows one thing about threads, which one it currently belongs to.
It doesn't know which it did belong to, and since the prior thread is deleted it could not know something about a thread which now doesn't exist.
If the purpose was for you, and the book, then that should have been said. But it wasn't said, and it does have a lot of overlap with readers wives, hence the merge.
If every post that should be separate can be identified, then I can split the thread. But the effort to do that would be greater than the effort for you to go through the thread.
Merges are unmergeable, though threads can be split if every post that should go to a new thread is identified.
-
• #6273
Velocio it was mentioned in nuknows first post in the thread. Whereby he stated that the thread was designed to find find bikes for the book, and for forum members to submit their suggestions, not their own bikes, but bikes that forum members had built that they thought were porn worthy and could be included in the book.
The thread title had porn in it, and so for that reason it's been lumped in with a thread which is bears no relation to.Merging seems in this instance to have been used as a weapon of spite or comedy than for any useful purpose of collating similar information.
-
• #6274
I did that merge, it was for neither comedy or spite. I looked at the thread titles... vaguely similar purpose... I opened both threads and quickly scanned how the threads were being used... very similar purpose... I hit merge.
We are where we are. The threads have been merged and there is no unmerge function.
If the merge was wrong, then my bad. When I scanned the thread I did so quickly and didn't see the reason it was a separate thread. But there remains no unmerge functionality, so what would you suggest?
-
• #6275
Is this about the sexiest forum rides thread?
Because that didn't state it was for a book, there's a book?,and was just a circvle jerk.
Banned.