-
• #4652
Sash http://www.lfgss.com/member19946.html
is selling stuff on here and on e-bay and bumping threads. He/she is a good trader and sells plenty of nice stuff but.....
Warned.
-
• #4653
Why is this muppet still with us?
-
• #4654
+1
-
• #4655
On what basis would I ban him?
-
• #4656
Ned, most entertaining poster for 2 years. Fact.
-
• #4657
He's funny but could be a scam artist.
-
• #4658
Wow, just caught up with Ned Gate.
Wasn't he banned 3 weeks ago?
Has anyone bought anything from him?
Seems harmless and entertaining. Was looking for a Zonda but there's no way I'd buy from him. -
• #4659
On what basis would I ban him?
That's what I was wondering, if anyone has actually successfully bought something from him?
His latest post is three windows for sale in Edinburgh, which there's no way he'll post, when before he freecycled cheap stuff like bottle cages for pick up only from Melton Mowbray.
He's either got two homes and no concept of how far people will travel to pick something up, or he's a timewaster, or a con artist, or both.
-
• #4660
I'd keep him on for the comedy value alone.
-
• #4661
Its Dov for sure.
-
• #4662
The comedy value is all very well until someone sends him £99 for a non-existent sash window and can't get it back. I also suspect it is a prominent forumenger, or former prominent forumenger, trolling, but we have no way of knowing this. Unless hippy/velocio know something about IPs that we don't...
-
• #4663
I believe it's highlandpro. I said so before.
The question remains regardless of identity... why would I ban him today? What has he done, other than embarrass himself and give us all giggles?
-
• #4664
Sorry hadn't seen that. Regardless of identity, no reason. But if it is highlandpro (and the windows being in Edinburgh fits in with this, because it was said he worked/lived in Edinburgh) I understand that he sold a number of dodgy things - including a frame to dooks which was a write off and dooks lost quite a lot of money on. So protecting lfgss users from being ripped off?
-
• #4665
Cipollini seems to be a trader judging by the amount of for sale threads, or maybe he has a shed to be envious of. I would have thought a donation was in order.
-
• #4666
Not really your problem.
-
• #4668
Fair enough, but that is yours?
-
• #4669
Cipollini seems to be a trader judging by the amount of for sale threads, or maybe he has a shed to be envious of. I would have thought a donation was in order.
What action do you think the mods could take? Force him to donate? Threaten to break his legs? Have Hippy sit on him (that would probably break his legs)?
-
• #4670
A gentle reminder was given the other day to jimjamO, I apologise if I am out of order but thought that this was the generally held rule.
-
• #4671
Fair enough, but that is yours?
No, but that is against Teh rulez. Not donating isn't, bad form maybe, but still.
-
• #4672
On what basis would I ban him?
Your forum and all, but allowing him to stay and be a tit would be to pat him on the back, rather than kick him in the head, like he deserves.
-
• #4673
has this been resolved yet?
-
• #4674
Banned Ned Kelly, based on strength of feedback from many people and on looking at his recent contributions and think yes, he's gone full troll.
-
• #4675
Can we Rep the boss?
^ Yep, extracting the urine somewhat