Moderators (requests and notices)

Posted on
Page
of 804
  • Hippy. merge the new and old threads.
    i know you want to

  • Rage all you need to

    See you're doing the same thing again David. If i disagree i'm 'Raging'...if i voice an opinion i'm 'going apeshit'.

    You need to stop trying to cast me in a bad light...people can make their own minds up about me without any help...If people really see me as a cunt, i'd prefer that opinion to be formed without help from you or anyone else thanks.

  • Hippy. merge the new and old threads.
    i know you want to

    Go ahead and do it...I've opened the official Grobags thread so people can post whatever they like in it and call me as many names in the tags as they see fit.

    I'll start a new thread for any further announcements.

  • Reminded me of this:

    http://www.lfgss.com/post434062.html

    I guess it just hasn't been demanded very much in the interim.

  • Oh, and on the subject of the 'good old days':

    Ahh the good old days when "hippy is fast" just outsized (puntastic) "hippy is fat" in the tag cloud..

  • The Norths thread seems to be the most heavily-tagged thread on the forum.

  • have you check any polo threads, especially south polo one

  • Ha, no, I haven't. Mind you, Norths has far more.

  • Go ahead and do it...I've opened the official Grobags thread so people can post whatever they like in it and call me as many names in the tags as they see fit.

    I'll start a new thread for any further announcements.

    Fab, I'll merge and if it gets closed again I'll split the merged one out again.

  • Fab, I'll merge and if it gets closed again I'll split the merged one out again.

    That would be a bit petty and unnecessary, no?

  • I don't get it Scott

    you are the first person to holler 'open forum' when it comes to discussions about forum caps and Torpha products but now you're bitching when you're being called out on manipulating your own thread

    I know who would have been one of the first 'wolfie smiths' if another manufacturer did that to their threads

  • I think both individuals make valid points, but both also indulge in childish prodding and poking. It's never reached dj levels of defensive can't-leave-it-alone-ness, but it often comes close.

    It would be fantastic if either party could formulate a post that doesn't contain an explicit or implicit character assassination.

    We should continue to have healthy dialogue about forum protocol. That's not in question. But those of us with a healthy post-count i.e. those who are perceived as having a bigger stake in the forum than the average poster, need to keep our in-fighting playful, as much for the benefit of onlookers as ourselves.

    Yours sincerely,
    No.64

  • Fuck off

  • hehe

  • got everyone with a higher member number than 2983 on ignore

  • I'm a name, not a number.

    Best wishes

    3942

    Quote me so It can be read by those that count.

  • Fuck off BMMF you stinky piece of crappy dog shit

    Quote me so It can be read by those that count.
    .

  • Quiet on here today, isn't it Murtle.

  • I love you Murtle and I always will. You know I really miss our 'special' days together.
    .

  • just like old times, bmmpf

  • felch me BMMFy one more time
    .

  • Bring Me My Fox

    #Lordingitoverusallsince64(bc)

  • Oh BMMFy, BMMFy, how was I supposed to know?
    My post-count was too low.

  • I don't get it Scott
    you are the first person to holler 'open forum' when it comes to discussions about forum caps and Torpha products but now you're bitching when you're being called out on manipulating your own thread

    Have i ever said that David couldn't close the cap thread or the Torm thread?
    If a thread is open then discussion is welcomed.
    Likewise, if a thread is on the main forum then it's there for discussion purposes.

    The Grobags thread is a classifieds thread, in the classified section...I didn't start it to enter into pages of discussion, I started it to sell bags. I have the right to close the thread, which i did...not to try and pervert the course of justice as is being implied on here...not to prevent people slagging off what i do...I closed it because I no longer make Archie's Grobags...they are no longer for sale.
    The fact that other people have 'discussed' on there is not anything i have control over, but it is still no different to people discussing the items for sale on ANY other classifieds thread...all of which the starters are entitled to close...regardless of what 'discussions' have taken place on there...RIGHT?
    Why my thread is suddenly being treated differently i don't know.
    If you actually bother to look through the thread you'll find pretty much nothing but 'for sale' lists, new products available and information about who's bags are ready...discussion made up probably ten percent at most...again, no different to anybody elses classifieds threads.
    I have chosen to make a few final announcements about future plans and to leave contact details...that's all. Hence why i then returned it to closed.

    As Davids pointless 'Archie's Grobags discussion thread' showed yesterday, people aren't as interested in discussing the bags anymore as he would like everybody to believe, and i stand by my comments that what i was doing wasn't upsetting anybody else or causing any problems to anybody but David.

    I'm through with the subject now.
    The new 'merged' thread is open now so you can all feel free to have all those lengthy discussions that you've all apparently been dying to have over the last week or so that the thread has been closed.

    Knock yourselves out!

  • Torpha

    Like.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Moderators (requests and notices)

Posted by Avatar for Velocio @Velocio

Actions