-
• #1177
Rage all you need to
See you're doing the same thing again David. If i disagree i'm 'Raging'...if i voice an opinion i'm 'going apeshit'.
You need to stop trying to cast me in a bad light...people can make their own minds up about me without any help...If people really see me as a cunt, i'd prefer that opinion to be formed without help from you or anyone else thanks.
-
• #1178
Hippy. merge the new and old threads.
i know you want to
Go ahead and do it...I've opened the official Grobags thread so people can post whatever they like in it and call me as many names in the tags as they see fit.
I'll start a new thread for any further announcements.
-
• #1179
Reminded me of this:
http://www.lfgss.com/post434062.html
I guess it just hasn't been demanded very much in the interim.
-
• #1180
Oh, and on the subject of the 'good old days':
Ahh the good old days when "hippy is fast" just outsized (puntastic) "hippy is fat" in the tag cloud..
-
• #1181
The Norths thread seems to be the most heavily-tagged thread on the forum.
-
• #1182
have you check any polo threads, especially south polo one
-
• #1183
Ha, no, I haven't. Mind you, Norths has far more.
-
• #1184
Go ahead and do it...I've opened the official Grobags thread so people can post whatever they like in it and call me as many names in the tags as they see fit.
I'll start a new thread for any further announcements.
Fab, I'll merge and if it gets closed again I'll split the merged one out again.
-
• #1185
Fab, I'll merge and if it gets closed again I'll split the merged one out again.
That would be a bit petty and unnecessary, no?
-
• #1186
I don't get it Scott
you are the first person to holler 'open forum' when it comes to discussions about forum caps and Torpha products but now you're bitching when you're being called out on manipulating your own thread
I know who would have been one of the first 'wolfie smiths' if another manufacturer did that to their threads
-
• #1187
I think both individuals make valid points, but both also indulge in childish prodding and poking. It's never reached dj levels of defensive can't-leave-it-alone-ness, but it often comes close.
It would be fantastic if either party could formulate a post that doesn't contain an explicit or implicit character assassination.
We should continue to have healthy dialogue about forum protocol. That's not in question. But those of us with a healthy post-count i.e. those who are perceived as having a bigger stake in the forum than the average poster, need to keep our in-fighting playful, as much for the benefit of onlookers as ourselves.
Yours sincerely,
No.64 -
• #1188
Fuck off
-
• #1189
hehe
-
• #1190
got everyone with a higher member number than 2983 on ignore
-
• #1191
I'm a name, not a number.
Best wishes
3942
Quote me so It can be read by those that count.
-
• #1192
Fuck off BMMF you stinky piece of crappy dog shit
Quote me so It can be read by those that count.
. -
• #1193
Quiet on here today, isn't it Murtle.
-
• #1194
I love you Murtle and I always will. You know I really miss our 'special' days together.
. -
• #1195
just like old times, bmmpf
-
• #1196
felch me BMMFy one more time
. -
• #1197
Bring Me My Fox
-
• #1198
Oh BMMFy, BMMFy, how was I supposed to know?
My post-count was too low. -
• #1199
I don't get it Scott
you are the first person to holler 'open forum' when it comes to discussions about forum caps and Torpha products but now you're bitching when you're being called out on manipulating your own threadHave i ever said that David couldn't close the cap thread or the Torm thread?
If a thread is open then discussion is welcomed.
Likewise, if a thread is on the main forum then it's there for discussion purposes.The Grobags thread is a classifieds thread, in the classified section...I didn't start it to enter into pages of discussion, I started it to sell bags. I have the right to close the thread, which i did...not to try and pervert the course of justice as is being implied on here...not to prevent people slagging off what i do...I closed it because I no longer make Archie's Grobags...they are no longer for sale.
The fact that other people have 'discussed' on there is not anything i have control over, but it is still no different to people discussing the items for sale on ANY other classifieds thread...all of which the starters are entitled to close...regardless of what 'discussions' have taken place on there...RIGHT?
Why my thread is suddenly being treated differently i don't know.
If you actually bother to look through the thread you'll find pretty much nothing but 'for sale' lists, new products available and information about who's bags are ready...discussion made up probably ten percent at most...again, no different to anybody elses classifieds threads.
I have chosen to make a few final announcements about future plans and to leave contact details...that's all. Hence why i then returned it to closed.As Davids pointless 'Archie's Grobags discussion thread' showed yesterday, people aren't as interested in discussing the bags anymore as he would like everybody to believe, and i stand by my comments that what i was doing wasn't upsetting anybody else or causing any problems to anybody but David.
I'm through with the subject now.
The new 'merged' thread is open now so you can all feel free to have all those lengthy discussions that you've all apparently been dying to have over the last week or so that the thread has been closed.Knock yourselves out!
-
• #1200
Torpha
Like.
Hippy. merge the new and old threads.
i know you want to