Functional bikes. Not Porn not Anti

Posted on
Page
of 1,122
First Prev
/ 1,122
Last Next
  • I'm getting old before my age, this thread is currently more porn than bike porn.

    Ahem..

    Young people, discussing mudguards

    It's not natural.

  • would it be possible to create a low trail bike by just having a custom fork made for a
    normal touring or road frame?

  • Yep, French low trail geometry is designed for the fork to take the weight so the frame can be made with lightweight tubing, someone did just that with his titanium bike.

    A normal touring frame might be a bit unforgiving if you plan to ride it unladen apart from the fork.

  • I would like to see how a low trail bike feels without getting a whole new bike. Probably would do it for a steel road frame I have, if I don't like it I can go back.

  • Can let you ride mine if you don't mind the ridiculously short reach.

    It handle extremely nimble without a front load, that you can make micromillimeter correction while cornering heavily, it one of those bike that if you came in too wide, you can easily corrected it, I actually found my old Cannondale CAAD10 to feel like a track bike after riding the 650B.

    Adding more weight in the front make it handle more like a road bike, less nimble when starting off (wheel flop) but still have that ability to have micromillimeter steering input.

  • Thanks, but I think I want to experience it for longer. I am not good at picking
    up subtle geometry differences straight away.
    Looking at this chart it looks like I just need a fork with 69mm rake instead of the 43mm,
    assuming I have a 73deg head angle.
    http://www.somafab.com/archives/product/grand-randonneur-frame-set

  • That's for 650b tyres, if your head tube is 73 and running around 28mm tyres, you'd only need a fork rake of 57-60mm to give you a trail of 45 (give or take).

    The Soma trail are smaller than average, mine is at 35mm with a 72mm head tube (70mm rake).

  • is this actually a low trail geometry?

  • Hard to do from photos, but performance road bike tend to have around 55-57mm of trail, a similar Eddy Merckx (Corsa) have a fork rake of 43mm.

    Using the same 73 degree head angle;

    Track bike have less rake (30mm) so usually have a trail around 60-65mm*.

    Road bike have a bit more rake (let says 42mm), so a trail around 55-57mm.

    Rando bike have a lots more (70mm), trail around 30-40mm.

    *ever wonder why people put their tyres at a higher pressure on track bike? now you do.

  • would it be possible to create a low trail bike by just having a custom fork made for a
    normal touring or road frame?

    Is there anyone offering OTP forks that would do the job?

  • Thorn have a 55mm rake audax fork for £100, but that about as much I know.

  • Like that Shand very much. Good colour as well, looking to get my Genesis Day One powder coated, think that's the colour right there.

  • Is that one 'functional' only because it's got mudguards?

  • Would you like tesco bags hanging from the hoods?

  • What is this thread?

  • Somewhere to post pics of bikes that look like they'll work nicely, but aren't the gleaming jewels of the Bike Porn thread.

  • I think we need to have this discussion. I've been losing sleep.

  • Somewhere to post pics of bikes that look like they'll work nicely, but aren't the gleaming jewels of the Bike Porn thread.

    I thought it was helping fill the glorious gap between 'street' fixys and touring bikes.

  • I think we need to have this discussion. I've been losing sleep.

    This.

  • I thought it was only amey that kept getting this thread wrong?

  • Amey and miro_o both.

  • …probably a pearoast...


  • [/IMG]

    Thats great, the guy has some really cool bikes too

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Functional bikes. Not Porn not Anti

Posted by Avatar for lessmann @lessmann

Actions