Functional bikes. Not Porn not Anti

Posted on
Page
of 1,122
First Prev
/ 1,122
Last Next
  • Not really.

  • That English I think is a repost.

    I think it could be the ultimate uk winter road bike. Love it.

  • Mudguards are shit though

  • loving the floral spokecards on this

  • Mudguards are shit though

    Yes, that's also a repost.

    I think the slightly shit 'guards might be 'homemade'? So it's creator-pride vs dry-feet.

  • Meh, he can make a good bike so why not make good guards. So much of his stuff seems to be different just to be different.

  • Amazing. Not sure 53x11 would get used much.

  • This

    really good price on that!

  • Amazing. Not sure 53x11 would get used much.

    Possibly not, but I doubt he'd ride with those knobby all the time.

  • am i missing something.... why do all these bike just have front racks? most have mounts for rear pannier racks, but are ignored in favor of a rack that will through the bike off balance when loaded up(bar the pashley post bike)......i use my front rack as a last resort, only when my rear cant take any more(oooerr misses)..... fashion over function?

  • It's simple - those bicycle handle better with a front load because they were designed to, it's function over fashion.

    It's better than a pair of panniers, or a saddlebag (apart from those bikepack kind), as they do affect how the bicycle feel when you give it the willies whether a front rack with a load make it easier to accelerate.

    I actually ride with a load on my bicycle as it was a little too nimble without a bag, it made my old Cannondale CAAD10 feel less nimble when unladen.

    Pashley post bike isn't exactly the best kind of bicycle for a front load.

  • I don't think all these bikes were designed for a front rack, Ed.

  • So I guess the trail and rake are setup so the bike tracks well with a certain weight? Does that make them suffer at other weights?

    There are racks that are independent of steering. Wouldn't they be better?

  • Possibly not, but I doubt he'd ride with those knobby all the time.

    Unless smaller tyres are used you'd have to hit 50mph before that gear was useful.

  • I don't think all these bikes were designed for a front rack, Ed.

    No you're right, not all, the all city one I doubt it's idea for a heavy load, but the last one definitely is.

  • front racks are kooler

  • Yes, that's also a repost.

    I think the slightly shit 'guards might be 'homemade'? So it's creator-pride vs dry-feet.

    I've forgotten the name of them, might be Salmon Profil?

    I have a pair in a box which I bought but then decided not to use.

  • Unless smaller tyres are used you'd have to hit 50mph before that gear was useful.

    Lower cadence perhaps? To be fair there's not much cassette you can get that have a low 13/14t like the old freewheel, I even modified my cassette as a 13-32 as I never use the 11t cog on the Genesis.

  • Plenty of chainrings though that'd let you ride around the closely spaced cogs on the cassette.

  • but 53tooths are kooler

  • front racks are kooler

    And aerodynamic flaring with a big bag too, like Dammit deep section wheels, it probably a placebo effect but I like the placebo effect either way.

  • but 53tooths are kooler

    That's a fucking compact when you compare it to Pantiani 55/44t chainset.

    Big ring it dude, big ring it!

  • I'm fucking drunk, see yall tomorrow smelly xynt.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Functional bikes. Not Porn not Anti

Posted by Avatar for lessmann @lessmann

Actions