Doping

it is said to increase power and stamina

the reason for sending the e-mail is that test samples have showed traces of the stuff, and the anti-doping authority wanted to warn the riders...

Not seen much evidence of systematic doping in place at the under sevens footy on Sunday mornings.. Well not since the DNA passports were introduced.

Ha!

I have seen some parent make their kids (six and seven year olds) neck cans of Red Bull at football though. Madness.

http://m.cyclingnews.com/news/schumacher-confesses-to-doping?ns_campaign=news&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=cyclingnews&ns_linkname=0&ns_fee=0

I've heard anecdotal evidence the performance gains are negliable,

Source?

http://m.cyclingnews.com/news/schumacher-confesses-to-doping?ns_campaign=news&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=cyclingnews&ns_linkname=0&ns_fee=0

Christiana Watches - weren't they the bunch who were going to help bring Rasmussen back aftern him ban?

Christina Hembo basically bought the team for him.

Source?

It was an anecdote. Clinic-esque

Flecha <3 Fuentes

Google translate version of the article in Dutch newspaper Volkskrant

Colour me surprised.

Contrary to accusations made by Tyler Hamilton amongst others, apparently Eufemiano Fuentes categorically denies ever having had any dealings with former CSC now Saxo-Tinkoff General Manager Bjarne Riis, let alone ever met him.

BBC World Media Monitoring

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/22111802

Doping in the news.

Tottenham Blood Spinning
This has to be so unbelievably borderline blood doping

Nah, it's for *recovery *so it's got to be ok.

Mate showed me this last week. The article had some bullshit about "it's not performance enhancing, it's just for recovery"

Erm fuckwits, enhancing recovery IS performance enhancing.

Fucking ridiculous, cheating girly boy footballers.

I'm sure you could define that as introducing a banned substance into the body, I mean you are increasing the levels of hormones and other things needed for healing, which would be the same as if you injected the testosterone

It is only introducing a banned substance if the substance is banned although it is still clearly sailing close to what looks like a dodgy procedure.

Blood doping is banned too. That doesn't introduce anything that wasn't already there. It doesn't mean it's not performance enhancing.

www.cyclingnews.com/news/costa-rican-team-accepts-three-positives-but-asks-for-b-sample

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/392225/Anti-drugs-Olympic-cyclist-Darryl-Webster-is-found-growing-cannabis

This is worth a watch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3rZphEtzSM

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/392225/Anti-drugs-Olympic-cyclist-Darryl-Webster-is-found-growing-cannabis

Ironic, because he is a very anti-doping and claims he lost his ride because of a refusal to get on the juice

Not exactly cheating though is it? There's anti-drugs in a performance sense vs. anti-getting smashed off your tits on happy happy fun stuff

I agree, just pointing out the irony, plus it is nature's strongest natural fibre and the oil has a myriad of applications.

Plus it makes music sound really, really good

Hi peeps. Few facts here. Only 9 plants were in flower. The remainder were small in grow stage. Any one who gardens will know you sow more than you require because you cannot be certain they will be succesful.
I have a very long and well documented, with my GP, Cannabis use to control my extreme anxiety, depressions and suicidal tendancies.
I refuse to use presciption anti depressents due to having on two occasions arrived at A@ E unconsious and close to death following over doses of presciption meds. Many anti depressents actual carry a increased risk of suicide warning in there guidance notes.
There is NO such risk with Cannabis.
My charge is purely for cultivation , NOT supply or intention to supply.
The POTENTIAL value figures given are, as is common , grosely exaggerated and If you use the home office,s own guidlines on quantity produced per plant ( 40grams) you reach a figure of much less than half and thats if EVERY plant was flowered. That there were two address,s was a personal circumstances situation, closing one while opening another ..a transition situation.
This " bust" occured last June, I have co operated from the onset. Despite that I spent 9 months on bail without charge contrary to home office guidlines that state 6 months should be the maxiumum without charge.
My stance on medicinal Cannabis has NO bearing whatsoever on my critisism of PED,s. They are entirely differant topics.
I do not expect everyone to understand or even to try to understand , to those that do, thank you .

From Darryl

It is only introducing a banned substance if the substance is banned although it is still clearly sailing close to what looks like a dodgy procedure.

Blood doping is banned too. That doesn't introduce anything that wasn't already there. It doesn't mean it's not performance enhancing.

I meant that the blood spinning is meant to increase the level of hormones as well as red blood cells in the blood. This artificial increase in testosterone, for example, from the blood spinning would surely replicate the results of just injecting testosterone.
I think I'm trying to say that although its 'just blood spinning' it would have the same effect as just straight up doping