-
• #1727
Epic article about the suspect pasts of the doctors of almost every Pro Tour team.
Leinders is an amateur compared to some of the guys operating without an official Paul Kimmage
fatwa over their heads. Business never personal Paul.http://www.cyclismas.com/2013/03/is-there-a-doctor-in-the-house/
-
• #1728
Also there is an actual Association of Italian Cycling Doctors
:)
-
• #1729
I bet their annual Christmas party is a blast!
-
• #1730
I spoke to an ex-racer here down under. He went to Belgium and got court and then got dragged through the coals here. This was about 8 years ago.
Apparently as a amateur you were expected to ride clean until you got a couple of wins under your belt. Then with that you got moved up to join the big boys (given something extra). The two speeds of the peloton and people being shithouse one week smashing it at the next race was also a frustration.
The thing that struck me was that the riders take so much shit legally. There are drugs that are band during the season that can be taken in the off season and vice-versa. He said that by the time you are offered (to help one reach the potential they are showing) the band drugs there is such a grey area that you don’t really think about it as cheating, just preparing.
The conversation made me sad as there were a few names dropped in as definite dopers that I respect as cyclists massively. Having said that, I don’t respect them any less now I know.
Also, apparently EPO is fucking amazing.
-
• #1731
Yore ortokorekt semes to be borked
-
• #1732
Spell checker dosent eve seem to work on the forum. As its not offical emails I dont really care.
-
• #1733
Well if you intended a glorious revelation, it's less likely to receive a fanatical reception if there's a dissonance interrupting the flow of every fragment.
-
• #1734
Is this the doping thread? Or the spelling thread? Or the use of as many big words as possible to make you look smarter than you actualy are thread?
-
• #1735
Or the sesquipedalianism thread?
ftfy
-
• #1736
It's difficult to take anyone seriously if they can't spell
-
• #1737
Why? Since when has spelling been a sign of intelligence?
-
• #1738
Spelling is one of the subsections of the Wechsler IQ test, but only one.
-
• #1739
So it's been an indicator of a particular type of cognitive ability for as long as that test has been the go-to clinical tool at least.
I'm not calling you thick, but I'm sure you knew that already.
-
• #1740
Fucksake!
-
• #1741
^Slang and profanities are exempt from grammar and correct spelling by the way.
-
• #1742
Having done many of those tests I know exactly what you are on about. As you can imagine the spelling part wasnt my highest scoring. Luckely I manage to score well in other parts. As for work, spell checkers mean I can manage fine.
Unfortunatly, the forum spelling police seem to be cracking down now days.
-
• #1743
Modern browsers will spell check any multi-line input box.
-
• #1744
Jeezus, give the guy a brake!
-
• #1745
It's difficult to take anyone seriously if they can't spell
...luckily punctuation doesn't matter shit!
;-)
-
• #1746
Modern browsers will spell check any multi-line input box.
Maybe on your PC.
-
• #1747
If you've more stories do post, your snippet was interesting.
-
• #1748
Fuck's sake!
ftfy
Jeezus, give the guy a brake!
-
• #1749
IQ tester fail. They need a subsection on sarcasm perception, or appropriacy of response to perceived sarcasm. I'll get on to the Wechsler people tomorrow...
-
• #1750
Maybe on your PC.
Name a modern browser which doesn't.
Sylvia Schenk (strongly anti-doping) is standing for the post of head of the German Cyclists' Federation again:
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/sport/fuehrungsdebatte-beim-bund-deutscher-radfahrer-rudolf-scharping-schwenkt-um-1.1619813-2