-
• #152
No, he asked how much you are supposed to take, not how much you are allowed to take before you get an adverse analytic something something.
-
• #153
mdcc, how much coke can I take?
PDF please.
-
• #154
I'd need to know your body mass and preferred variant of Coke™, but you can check for yourself at http://www.energyfiend.com/death-by-caffeine
-
• #155
Has anybody here used ammonia caps or nose tork?
People in the weightlifting community absolutely love the stuff. Think it might work for sprints.
-
• #156
Please don't say 'weightlifting community', just say 'weightlifters'. Everything is a community these days.
-
• #157
Yes, DFP, please respect the feelings of people in the wiganwill community on this issue.
-
• #158
Possibility I was right all along:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129359637
-
• #159
really really interesting report for the anti doping conference in Australia later this month...
http://www.newcyclingpathway.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/21-NOW-FINAL-.pdf
-
• #160
Ooops...Contador seems to have messed up his masking agent regime during the tour:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/alberto-contador-tests-positive-for-clenbuterol
http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/09/news/contador-tests-positive-for-clenbuterol_143791
Assuming that this is an actual "adverse analytical finding", and given the strict liability rules, it looks like Schleck has won the 2010 Tour. -
• #161
Been waiting for this. He had to get caught one day.
-
• #162
Finally
-
• #163
Contado....
oh.
-
• #164
The amount is tiny. He's not going to get banned.
-
• #165
Just joking
-
• #166
I read somewhere that it was 50 picograms. That is nothing (generally speaking) and it really comes down to how sensitive their assay is..... BUT I watched that mofo glide up hills which isn't right/possible regardless.
-
• #167
^Science talks
-
• #168
FFS. What pro cyclists do on a grand tour isn't possible without drugs.
not science just an opinion
-
• #169
Assuming that this is an actual "adverse analytical finding", and given the strict liability rules, it looks like Schleck has won the 2010 Tour.
Thank god for that, now at least there'll be a winner who is clean...
oh.
Actually, how far do we have to go down the GC to find a non-doper?
-
• #170
The amount is tiny. He's not going to get banned.
Yeah, seems harsh. They should just dock him 40 seconds.
-
• #171
Thank god for that, now at least there'll be a winner who is clean...
oh.
Actually, how far do we have to go down the GC to find a non-doper?
Lantern rouge
Yeah, seems harsh. They should just dock him 40 seconds.
HA!
-
• #172
Actually, how far do we have to go down the GC to find a non-doper?
154th
-
• #173
None of the riders. Maybe some of the reporters covering the Tour.
-
• #174
I'm with the russell howard school on this one.
Do what you like if it makes it more fun to watch. Fill them up with every drug they can.
Maybe a gladiatorial fight to the death at the end of the tour too.
-
• #175
I'm with the russell howard school on this one.
Do what you like if it makes it more fun to watch. Fill them up with every drug they can.
Maybe a gladiatorial fight to the death at the end of the tour too.
please do not post the picture of the saddlebags at dawn scrap from this years tour again
Not any more
1 Attachment