-
• #5852
Can you use much higher shutter speeds when using flash with mirrorless cameras?
If there was a modern camera like this but with up to date speed of use and high frames per second rate, I'd be all over it!...is there?
Most mirrorless: no, I don't think so. Fuji X100/S: yes, as it has a leaf shutter. Can sync up to something like 1/1000, assuming your speedlight is fast enough to fire at close to full capacity in that time. But 1/500, certainly...
-
• #5853
Sometimes you can get away with going beyond the flash sync speed without any problems but its best to stay below it. Bear in mind the flash will freeze the subject somewhat more than the shutter speed will anyway so for panning, 1/125 might be enough...
-
• #5854
Well I gave that camera away a long time ago, I still have a kodak p880 bridge camera from 2005, I just tested it, you can use flash at 1/4000th either built in or with flashgun. This one has evf unfortunately.
-
• #5855
Small sensor = small + fast shutter.
-
• #5856
http://inmybag.net/ dies?
The stormchaser (lastest one) has a shitload of kit.
ah it's working again. It was just giving me timeouts when I tried before
-
• #5857
http://inmybag.net/ dies?
The stormchaser (lastest one) has a shitload of kit.
photographer equivalent to pedalroom
much dick waving
-
• #5858
Nikons have a way of cheating the sync, it's pretty clever, and works some of the time, depending on your situation. I've used it many times in a fix.
Details here:
http://nikonclspracticalguide.blogspot.co.uk/2008/03/10-auto-fp-high-speed-sync-explained.html -
• #5859
much dick waving
Can't get away from the fact that the camera is a phallic object... most photographers are male, I'd say about 80% at least.
-
• #5860
Guess that's why these zoom lenses are so popular..
-
• #5861
-
• #5862
Can you use much higher shutter speeds when using flash with mirrorless cameras?
The shutter operates in 2 ways, below flash sync speed the whole sensor is exposed at once. Above flash sync the sensor is exposed by a slit which moves across the sensor, obviously at high speed. If your flash doesn't have the capacity to pulse instead of flash above the sync speed then you get a small part of the frame exposed.
You need a camera and flash that support high speed sync.
TTL works well under sync speeds anyway.
What is the effect you are looking to achieve?
-
• #5863
-
• #5864
-
• #5865
Excellent as ever
-
• #5866
thanks bro, brighton beach west of the pier is inspiringly grim
-
• #5867
-
• #5869
ISO 400,000
http://www.bjp-online.com/2014/02/nikon-unveils-the-d4s-its-ultimate-imaging-machine/
It ain't a native iso though - its a digitally pushed iso 12,800 setting so will probably look horrible.
-
• #5870
Shit, I was going to buy a couple for my new peeping-tom project but now I won't bother.
-
• #5872
So went out with the Sony A7R today... it's nice BUT
got dust on the sensor (so easy, it's right there when you remove a lense)
then dropped a blower somehow and looks like i've scratched the sensorordered some stuff to wet clean it, but yay for being able to use the camera for 3 hours. guessing a replacement sensor is going to be fuck off expensive sigh
-
• #5873
If you've scratched anything it won't be the sensor, it'll be the protective or anti aliasing filter.
It'll probably still be spendy to have fixed but not new sensor spendy.
You may even be able to do a diy removal and get a sharper camera.
-
• #5874
Nikon acknowledges dust/oil problem with D600. Offers free clean and shutter mechanism replacement.
-
• #5875
Reminds me that I need to sort out the oil spots on my d7000. Humph
Can you use much higher shutter speeds when using flash with mirrorless cameras?
One of my first digital cameras, a fixed lens "bridge" camera, it had an optical (non ttl) zoom viewfinder and I could use flash with any shutter speed, was great for action as I could pan without losing sight momentarily in the viewfinder.
Of course back then digital cameras were slow and frames per second rate poor.
If there was a modern camera like this but with up to date speed of use and high frames per second rate, I'd be all over it!...is there?