-
• #19827
Some online service I dunno yet.
-
• #19828
The lighting is fabulous
-
• #19829
Chichester.
3 Attachments
-
• #19830
Reject from last week’s photo comp.
1 Attachment
-
• #19831
And this guy.
1 Attachment
-
• #19832
both ace
-
• #19833
old photo
1 Attachment
-
• #19834
two panos
2 Attachments
-
• #19835
I guess this isn't the place for phone photos huh
-
• #19836
Nothing wrong with posting them here, but there's also a special thread for them:
-
• #19837
old photo
nice
-
• #19838
^^ Post them here; camera phones are digital and there never was a need a for a separate thread. Plus, this one is much livelier.
-
• #19839
out the window
2 Attachments
-
• #19840
sorry can't find the originals.
2 Attachments
-
• #19841
Love ’em
-
• #19842
you using HDR for these?
I should get back into photography this summer. -
• #19843
No, I just flatten the contrast a lot.
-
• #19844
If we're allowed phone pictures, streetlight and wet branches.
1 Attachment
-
• #19845
Nice. I've ways been a fan of that sort of mindset. What ISO are you getting away with?
-
• #19846
It's all on a tripod at ISO 100.
-
• #19847
Good move.
-
• #19848
I like the first of those two more for its homogeneity and lack of unnecessary details. Mainly that the street sign/lamp posts are a little distracting from the negative center space in the second.
Just thinking how much better it would be without the fence, signs or posts.
I know it's just a fun snap. I just like photos like that.
-
• #19849
just need an angle grinder
1 Attachment
-
• #19850
.
2 Attachments
Where are you planning on getting it printed?