Relationships

Posted on
Page
of 6
  • That's just sick!

  • good in the cot though...

    does he hold your ankles just so..?

  • since its been merged its back on my radar.

    Ha! Such wonderful prickery.

    : )

  • good in the cot though...

    It's true, I am a duvet Olympian.

  • rehashing old material is unlike you tynan.

    Racist

    .

  • I can only apologize, markyboy, for not writing in perfect Engish- but on this web forum, we've seen that it doesn't really matter.

    I take very strong exception to this.

    :)

  • So does I

  • Ha! Such wonderful prickery.

    : )

    Its perfectly fitting that you have so many *pseudo*nyms on this forum.
    I couldn't imagine a better way of describing you than that prefix.

  • Its perfectly fitting that you have so many *pseudo*nyms on this forum.

    I have just one account in use at a time, I change my name when I get tired of dreary little pricks like you following me around and moaning about anything I post.

    I was quite happy posting here as Tynan or Wheels (or a few others) most people here are pretty cool and are not bothered by pretty much anything anyone posts, that's one of the great things about this forum, but unfortunately I tend to (overtime) build up a small group of tedious pricks who whine and moan and PM me about my posts.

    If it helps I can remove my post (#59), would that help you deal with whatever problems you are having with this thread ?

    I couldn't imagine a better way of describing you than that prefix.

    You poor little thing.

  • What a shitty little response.
    You continue to change because you have people whining at you?

    That's so laughable that I genuinely can't stop pitying you.
    Since I have never followed you around, you pompous pillock, I can only pity your delusion of victimisation.
    And again since it was you who started throwing insults around, yet again, maybe a bit of introspection would be handy.

    I used to think of you as an intelligent interesting poster, as your posts at first glance appear well thought through and researched, but underneath any of them is a deluded failure to grasp a concept that you've read in the Times or what ever other shitty source that you subscribe to.

    More importantly though, I had thought of you as one of the people who would discuss a point rather than immediately making digs at the other person. It seems that having realised you're essentially full of re-hashed bollocks, your confidence has disappeared, and henceforth your only response is to insult.

  • In fact the thing I'm most irritated about is you having the gall to think that I would bother to follow you around.

    Name me one example, except for the last time you posted that un-referenced piece on prolactin, that I had bothered to respond to your post. Let alone point out the flaws in your posting of a theory as fact, and even more to the point I don't thin that, apart from that one time, we've actually had a discussion/ point of view clash on here.

  • You continue to change [your user name] because you have people whining at you?

    Yep, it gets irritating after a while, so rather than HTFU and ignore them after a while I take the coward's approach and just change my username, it allows me (for a while) to post freely without pricks like you turning up to whine.

    And again since it was you who started throwing insults around . . .

    My opening post on this thread addresses no one, it's not aimed at nor critical of anyone, I thought it was interesting information and relevant to the subject.

    On the other hand your response is aimed at me, critical of me, I am "rehashing old material", how you are "disappointed", unhappy at my lack of references (why not ask for them rather than whining about them not being there), how I am "cherry picking", how I suffer from 'confirmation bias" - and - the online drama queen stalwart - how you are going to put this thread on "ignore" (which is shorthand for "I will feverishly read all responses").

    Sure you don't call me a 'cunt', but it's a pointlessly needling post and typical of a few pricks who think my job is to entertain you (the "you're not funny anymore" - "you're rehashing old material" is a common theme amongst the whiners.)

    You are disappointed with what I posted ? So what, get over it.

  • In fact the thing I'm most irritated about is you having the gall to think that I would bother to follow you around.

    Name me one example, except for the last time you posted that un-referenced piece on prolactin, that I had bothered to respond to your post. Let alone point out the flaws in your posting of a theory as fact, and even more to the point I don't thin that, apart from that one time, we've actually had a discussion/ point of view clash on here.

    How are you getting on with that 'ignore' button, found it yet ?

  • I had a relationship too.

    But you probably ate it, with potato wedges.

  • Such a nice lad in real life.

  • I have just one account in use at a time, I change my name when I get tired of dreary little pricks like you following me around and moaning about anything I post.

    i thought you were made of sterner stuff? maybe you need to learn how to be an ignorant cunt it works for me.

  • Get a room, you 2 inogrant cnuts. :)

  • I have just one account in use at a time, I change my name when I get tired of dreary little pricks like you following me around and moaning about anything I post.

    This would undoubtedly work better if you didn't have such an extremely distinctive posting style. :)

  • Get a room, you 2 inogrant cnuts. :)

    Reported, for intentional crimes against the Law of Good Spelling on This Forum.

  • Get a room, you 2 immigrant cnuts. :)

    racist

  • bitche, please.

  • Reported, for intentional crimes against the Law of Good Spelling on This Forum.

    I think it's more like: Law of Fucking Good Speeling Sir

  • That was tynan.

    Yes, I have reported the cunt.

  • i thought you were made of sterner stuff? maybe you need to learn how to be an ignorant cunt it works for me.

    I'm already an ignorant cunt (I learnt how from this forum).

  • This would undoubtedly work better if you didn't have such an extremely distinctive posting style. :)

    How would you know if you were wrong ?

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Relationships

Posted by Avatar for Light_EDDed @Light_EDDed

Actions