-
• #52
Both Brian and Matt started the league as team members and therefore were unable to sub for other teams. If they have now quit from their respective teams then they shouldn't technically be allowed to sub for other teams.
TBH, that was my intial response to brians post too. Otherwise, why declare yourself part of a team at the start of the season? Damn, this rules business is complicated.
I think youre right in suggesting that as it stands, players still shouldnt be allowed to sub for other league teams if they leave their declared team. I think there's a whole transfer rules debate that we're starting to see a need for, in time for next season, and this is one of the situations we need to discuss, because Im also not sure how fair it is to the players. Its also hard on the rest of BRPC in this case, because their one sub is now permanently being used.
-
• #54
we are damned
we'll pul through without him, after all it's only dale.
-
• #55
Otherwise, why declare yourself part of a team at the start of the season?
The reason for the 4-some was that Brian was foreseeing a lot of time away from London, and still is. Hassan wasn't sure if he was going to be in the country for the entire season so we declared them both zombies (before the league even).
My idea.
-
• #56
i declare anyone that dosn't spell a word with their original players names is gay and should forfeit their right to bear mallets.
-
• #57
to kill a zombie you have to go for a head shot.
-
• #58
;1091893']The reason for the 4-some was that Brian was foreseeing a lot of time away from London, and still is. Hassan wasn't sure if he was going to be in the country for the entire season so we declared them both zombies (before the league even).
My idea.
Yeah. That always made sense. That wasnt aimed at bryan, or zombies in particular,at all. I meant it more in the general league rule sense of "If you join a team (even as their sub), rather than just being a floating sub, youre still a team member, and thus also shouldnt be allowed to leave and go back to floating sub status under the current league rules".
-
• #59
Rules are tiresome.
Lets. Play. Polo.
-
• #60
polo is tiresome... when polo players are tired we talk rules.
the circle of polo.
-
• #61
in the argy about zombie having four players, the rules were quoted and it said that a team consisted of three players, it needs clarifying whether that means off court or only on court.
We decided to not have a vote about whether a team could have a permanent sub, with understanding being that we don't care about this (so, yes, they can) and we don't need to make another rule.
So the rule that states a team only has three players should be interpreted to refer only to on the court.
-
• #62
so i could register a team next season and pick from the subs every week for each fixture? with me being the only permanent player? or a conglomerate of players could register a team and have a rotation system?
(just to clarify i dont care about this, zombie thing is fine by me, just hypothesising or wtvr)
-
• #63
it's fine as is for this year, but i think it should be modified/clarified when we do the rules discussions before the start of the next league.
-
• #64
I suppose so, no doubt you'd be ridiculed for it.
Didn't all the teams have at least 3 members at the start of the league though?
-
• #65
CONGLOMERATE ARMY! who's in for 2010?!?
- Snoops
- Snoops
-
• #66
It's looking pretty damned lonely in your conglomerate army.
-
• #67
fuck you all.
pricks
-
• #68
CONGLOMERATE ARMY! who's in for 2010?!?
- Snoops
- French Child
- Snoops
-
• #69
UNITED REBEL FORCES
- Jono
- Jono
-
• #70
CONGLOMERATE ARMY! who's in for 2010?!?
- Snoops
- French Child
- Mitch fat 'gobby' kid
- Mitch skinny 'chav' kid
- mitch ugly 'knifey' kid
- Snoops
-
• #71
Ninja knife attack (justice fo real)
1, Shins
-
• #72
CONGLOMERATE ARMY! who's in for 2010?!?
- Snoops
- French Child
- Mitch fat 'gobby' kid
- Mitch skinny 'chav' kid
- mitch ugly 'knifey' kid
- Emmet
- Snoops
-
• #73
dt's lurking, i know he's tempted, join the CONGER!!
-
• #74
h ah ha^ snoops youre such a douche.
-
• #75
I am neither a child or a polo whore.
I am part of St Ockwells' brotherhood, a Polo Missionary reaching out into stuff...Yeah, dark stuff.
#pot-kettle-black