Another reason to licence, MOT and insure cyclists

Posted on
Page
of 3
First Prev
/ 3
  • my thoughts exactly. I love beign able to get a load of bits from somewhere and build yourself a bike and ride, without having to worry about legality of it. would be ludicrous to try any other way

    also, no more 'this bike has brakeless'!

  • shut it, anne is back its great

    Anne's the reason it's called "Watchdog".

  • Your under use of comma's is also deplorable.

    There is nothing so weak as failed pedantry, Mr Twotimes; you have a misplaced apostrophe. The plural of comma is "commas", not "comma's" which indicates possesion by a comma.

  • So anyway.... taxing bikes, what a load of toss!

  • which indicates possesion by a comma.

    So therefore we would need a grammatical bell, book and candle?

  • There is nothing so weak as failed pedantry

    Except, perhaps, being a day late in noticing the greengrocers' apostrophe.

  • which indicates possesion by a comma.

    So no-one spotted the spelling mistake in 'possession' amid all this criticism? ;P

  • Uh... oppression of the cyclist? Sticking it to the man by riding my bike even if my brakes don't work? Eh? eh? Anyone?

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Another reason to licence, MOT and insure cyclists

Posted by Avatar for crimsonape @crimsonape

Actions