-
• #94302
thanks both of you. now to make a hemisphere.
1 Attachment
-
• #94303
Made it too easy for you eh? ;)
Based on your sketch, should there not be 10 layers? And out of curiosity, what are you making?
-
• #94304
If the top of each layer intersects the (hemi-) sphere, the top plank has zero radius. It could just be a vertical spike or something.
Making the intercept at the centre of each layer, as for the planks in the 2-dimensional version, would give you a non-infinitesimal top layer.
-
• #94305
my error, cell A5 should be 0.
making some variation on the below. Also some coat hooks which will have 'ball' ends.
2 Attachments
-
• #94306
That also works: it just means you're looking at where the bottom surface of each layer touches the sphere, instead of the top surface.
-
• #94308
Do we have a thread for commuter jacket recommendations? It's probably not a good fit for "stylish cycling kit"...
-
• #94309
Hilltrek Greenspot remake is a decent compromise between water resistance and comfort.
-
• #94310
The past few days I've had a note through my door (on official looking headed paper) saying I've been selected by the office of national statistics to take part in one of their surveys.
I had someone call at my door this evening (laminated pass and whatnot) saying that they were from the ONS and wanted to interview me. I said it wasn't convenient (I was eating my tea) and they said we could do it by phone tomorrow.
It seems kosher but obviously a bit wary of giving out personal info. Any thoughts?
-
• #94311
Try the “ultimate riding jacket” thread:
-
• #94312
Any thoughts?
Tell them you're not interested in taking part; ONS surveys are voluntary. I was considerably less polite than that when they asked me, but it's up to you how nicely you want to decline. The important thing is that everybody should refuse to give information to the government, they only ever use it to accrete power to themselves and thereby steal it from you.
-
• #94313
Logically therefore should you not have the interview but tell ridiculous lies, convincingly?
-
• #94314
-
• #94315
It seems kosher but obviously a bit wary of giving out personal info. Any thoughts?
It's a real PITA. It's not just once - they'll want to ask you hours of pointless questions once a quarter for at least a year.
-
• #94316
Any thoughts?
Tell them to go fuck themselves?
-
• #94317
^this
And ask if they can pass on the same message to the TV licensing people as well
-
• #94318
I'm not 100% opposed to giving the information. I use ONS stats reasonably regularly so it would be a bit hypocritical to refuse to contribute (although if it takes more than 15 minutes I probably can't be arsed). It's more about confirming that they are the ONS.
-
• #94319
fyi - for those who helped on the last page.
1 Attachment
-
• #94320
Nice! That should work out pretty well I think, the challenging thing will probably be getting the dome shape right on the top disc when sanding it down. Out of curiosity, what software is this?
-
• #94321
Wouldn't it be easier to bind all the sheets together, then core 50mm cylinders and then turn it in a lathe, or are these calculations part of the aforementioned process?
-
• #94322
Fusion 360 by the look of the screen shot
-
• #94323
yes, fusion 360.
@coventry_eagle - i'm not lathe proficient unfortunately, although would be relatively easy i suspect
-
• #94324
Ah I see. Why not try both of you have access to a lathe?
Love the nicely stacked Tetris like blocks in the background of the initial post and yeah the burnt edges of laser cut wood!
All the best man and yeah keep us updated on the progress!
-
• #94325
I did it last year coz they gave me something like 20 quid to spend on Amazon. Win
r will be constant; r = 20.
h however will increase 1 x by each circle (n); hence h = 5*n
I.e. The first d will be d1 = (20^2-(5x1)^2)^(1/2)
Second one, d2 = (20^2-(5x2)^2)^(1/2)
Solve that and you'll get your disc radius, d for n, n+1 ...