-
• #55777
^agreed
-
• #55778
I see that yeah but how then does
- If this is your main home and you’re left with no-one who counts as an adult, your bill will be reduced by 50%.
apply?
** edit ** the confusion Im having is are they counting you (me) as a number in your calculation (apollos) the wording is odd
- If this is your main home and you’re left with no-one who counts as an adult, your bill will be reduced by 50%.
-
• #55779
probably not, not in stock anyway.
Is yours a triple 130/130/74?
Thanks mate but nvm. Found one with both chainrings :)
-
• #55780
right i think your just confusing because if your both in the list you get 100% off not 50% (ive not paid council tax yet in 4 years as ive always lived with all students, always in private lets)
-
• #55781
If everyone living in the house (the number is irrelevant) is either a child or is on the exempt list. For example, someone with a severe mental disability and their live in carer. They are both exempt, so the number of adults living in the property is zero. Zero = 50% off.
If one person in the property isn't exempt and is an adult then you have one adult in the house. The number of children and other exempt people doesn't matter - there's one adult in the house and a single adult household gets 25% off.
If you have two or more adults in the property (the number of children or exempt adults also living there is irrelevant) then you get naaaaafin off.
However, and I suspect that this is where the problem lies, there's a separate rule (dealt with here) which applies only to students so that if everyone in the house is a full-time student then there's a total exemption.
Easy!
-
• #55782
thansk danstuff!
'bugger' is my outcome i guess
-
• #55783
No probs. Welcome to the 25% off club.
-
• #55784
I heard this expression recently, but can't remember what the first word is in the initials. When you're in the pub and somebody shows you a video on their phone to support what is currently being discussed. It's something like: technology, media, internet...
something assisted conversation / ...A.C
-
• #55785
I've seen computer assisted conversation - although purely within the context of helping the infirm or severely disabled.
-
• #55786
Hmm interesting. I only want to know so I can overuse the term before it becomes common dialect.
-
• #55787
prick = phone researched information creates know-it-alls
-
• #55788
Uniqlo? Look kind of shitty though.
-
• #55789
Google Assisted Conversation?
-
• #55790
cock = computer optimised conversational knowledge
-
• #55791
penis = phone-enhance, no intelligence suspected
-
• #55792
vagina = virtually all gathered intelligence now available
-
• #55793
anus = another numbskull using smartphone
-
• #55794
gooch = google optimised object causing hassle
-
• #55795
High quality spam.
^^^^^^^ Doesn't look that bad imo. And they really are ultra light. 130gram for a medium size men's jacket.
-
• #55796
What would be a reasonable price to get a silver chainring anodised black?
/has anyone got a spare 47t 44RN chainring?
-
• #55797
£20, but it's not a good idea. If you do it right (either mask the teeth or get it hard anodised), you're looking at more like £80, if you just soft anodise the whole lot the anodising wears off the teeth very quickly and combines with your chain lube to make an alumina grinding paste. Best to just mask the teeth and rattle can the rest at home.
Also (@Vince) this is why AQA is better than PMing me - so I don't have to answer the same question twice :-)
-
• #55798
Well that's that then.
-
• #55799
Bugger, now I'm on the naughty step. I can see my future, it involves regular chain cleaning until all anodising has worn off. However, it only cost £30 for chainset and chainring, that's less than a wrecked chain saved by paying £80.
-
• #55800
Worth it, they do look nice.
^^^this
2
-1