-
• #114702
You can calculate this for yourself, but 42.1mm.
α=2.1 to 2.4×10-5.K-1 depending on which aluminium alloy
ΔT=100K
42×(1+(2.1×10-5×100))=42.09
42×(1+(2.4×10-5×100))=42.10 -
• #114703
Lovely jubbly. I did look it up but I just found a load of people infighting about the correct way to do it and it hurt my head
-
• #114704
Is it the coefficient of linear expansion thing I did at A level? Should it have pi in or somewhere as its a radius thing, now my head is hurting lol
-
• #114705
Should it have pi in
The π cancels out if you're minded to go about it that way. Convert the OD to a circumference by multiplying by π, calculate linear increase in circumference, convert that back to a diameter increase by dividing by π
-
• #114706
Assuming an isotropic material, all the dimensions increase in the same proportions. The usual trick question is to ask an unthinking person whether the ID grows or shrinks 🙂
-
• #114707
Shrinks? The material expands in all directions 🙃
QI klaxon sounding
-
• #114708
-
• #114709
This is more of a cutaway but is not a barracuda
1 Attachment
-
• #114710
Amazing, thank you- not quite how I remember it in my head but this must be it - they are so cool, thankyou
-
• #114711
Guessing that is where Paul Jackson got his inspiration
-
• #114712
Any fire/fire safety experts here? I.e. trainers?
Anyone know any?
-
• #114713
I'm planning to start a new project, based on a used high-end steel frame. I don't have any affinity for a particular brand, so I'll pick it based on size, and the steel used in construction.
Can someone please advise what the lightest steel used in production frames across a)70s b)80s c)90s
I guess Columbus Max was no1 in the 90s?
I'm more interested in finding something lightweight, rather than strong/stiff.
Thanks in advance.
-
• #114714
Not sure of lightest brand but something in 753 would probably be a good bet for lightweight
-
• #114715
Why not titanium?
-
• #114716
I'm not sure Max was ever the lightest steel tubing that Columbus produced, I think EL/OS was lighter.
Reynolds 753 was introduced in the 70s and positioned as a lightweight tubing, which predates EL/OS.
Frames got lighter in the 90s when TIG welding became more widespread, I think Dedacciai had lighter tubing than both Reynolds and Columbus then.
-
• #114717
Ideally looking for something that has tubing with a small OD and a curved steel fork!
-
• #114718
Ishiwata 017 used to be a tester’s favourite for light weight in the early 80s
-
• #114719
See also:
-
• #114720
Ishiwata 017 used to be tester’s favourite for light weight in the early 80s
FTFY 🙂
-
• #114721
Thanks. My paper doodling was getting messy lol
I remember the example in the link below about adding a metre to a piece of string around the earth from school lol
https://jumk.de/math-physics-formulary/increase-in-circumference.php
-
• #114722
That's just not true
-
• #114723
The metre of additional string around the earth raising it around 16cm? That bit is certainly true
-
• #114724
I'm trying and failing to cut very thin leather precisely. I want multiple geometric and curved cuts and i want them identical every time. I just can't do it with hand tools. What's the cheapest laser cutter i could use?
-
• #114725
How about a cutting machine?
https://www.johnlewis.com/cricut-maker-ultimate-cutting-machine-champagne/p4801500
If an aluminium tube is 42mm OD at room temperature, what would the OD be when heated uniformly to 120 deg C?