This week's fixtures & results League II (winter 2009/2010)

Posted on
Page
of 260
  • guys, my notes on the game play are a mess. however my notes on the score are clear as, and score for the first game was 5-0.
    moog don't stir.

  • Emmet, you suck

    :^]

  • Not stirring shit up, nice write up but it was defiantly 5-1. As what ref says goes fair enough I''ll shut up about it, I was just confirming what Lemon said as an initial response to the match report.

  • yeah, sorry dude, nice write up, but the score for the first game was 5-1, anyway what the ref says goes i suppose, so i'll shut up :)

  • The scores posted up after the game were without looking at the notes, by polonium folk and therefore were not confirmed at the time between the ref and players. this is my fault as i was too lazy to get my notes out of the bag and too eager to play polo. I felt that the scores were as posted in the write up because of my notes and because I remember being excited by what I felt was poloniums first goal (in the second game). I sincerely apologise if I am wrong, however up to now I have had no doubt about the scores.

  • as i said, what the ref says goes, im not gonna get into an argument about it :)

  • no argument, no polo.

  • Re-match.

  • vidal, would you like to say anything about this?

  • Seriously, ref has the final say, if thats what Em says as the ref, then cool. I REALLY dont want a repeat of last weeks 'antics'.

  • Hey Los Conos and Dinos whens good for you this week I can do Wednesday.

    we are playing Cosmic on Weds at Newington. Waiting to see if A&J want to play two fixtures...

  • antics? what antics.. what did i miss

  • I sincerely apologise if I am wrong, however up to now I have had no doubt about the scores.

    Why stop at the scores...Emmet has a vested interest in this match as he plays for a west london team. i'd like this investigated!

  • hey! look at this! -------------------------->

  • awesome huh?

  • Most compelling.

  • Why stop at the scores...Emmet has a vested interest in this match as he plays for a west london team. i'd like this investigated!

    This is incorrect, but by all means bring on the show trial.

  • ha! poor chekov! jump! jump chekov!

  • ha! poor chekov! jump! jump chekov!

    I think you will find it was Bukharin and the rest of the anti-polo faction.


  • The anti-polo containment field cannae take it cap'n!

  • weird, cos, from my point of view, like, emmet is chekov, and bones, scotty and uhura represent greasy, mr lemon and ... er... someone else. crazy.

  • Great write up em, I've got to admit that I thought I was a bit rough in that game... Bit over competative, and I'm sorry if I bruised or damaged any of the tap out.

    One goal here or there doesn't bother me (it was tom that scored though so maybe it annoys himmore?! :) the result s the same really...

    Don't want it to overshadow a great game and write up.

  • ha, very good!

    by any means, bureaucracy will be the end of the (polo) revolution.

  • One goal here or there doesn't bother me (it was tom that scored though so maybe it annoys himmore?! :) the result s the same really...

    Don't want it to overshadow a great game and write up.

    werd.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

This week's fixtures & results League II (winter 2009/2010)

Posted by Avatar for turnpedal @turnpedal

Actions