-
• #302
I'm looking for a word that has a meaning similar to cavalcade. Something that describes a kind of comedy procession, but I can't find it anywhere. Can't even remember what it begins with.
I've UTFS honest, can anyone help me? -
• #303
I'm looking for a word that has a meaning similar to cavalcade. Something that describes a kind of comedy procession, but I can't find it anywhere. Can't even remember what it begins with.
I've UTFS honest, can anyone help me?'Charivari'...
-
• #304
promenade.
carnival. -
• #305
I mean that the reification of language as divorced from its 'meaning', no matter how contested that idea might be, is a sort of fetishism. And I don't agree that words are always 'things', at all – I think words are only 'things' in one sense: the material fact of the marks on the page, as pure sign. A 'word' needs to be a compound of sign and signified to work as a signifier. So in what sense is a verbal utterance without an abstract referent a 'word' at all? Of course this is all complicated. It's a sign of how thrilling my Friday nights are that I'm discussing semibloodyotics, frankly. You're a lapsed linguist, BMMF? Interesting.
Phew, Barthes before bedtime, heavyweight stuff ;-)
-
• #306
Just ignore me, that's the spirit.
-
• #307
Felch; it conveys, almost onomatopoieacally, the lush beauty of the act.
I'd agree with plurabelle that the thread is ambiguous and without much merit if we're not given people's reasons for their lexical proclivities. I explained my fondness for 'aubergine', but then you'd expect that, as I'm a linguist, albeit a casual/lapsed/sad excuse for one these days.
.
Er, beat you to it BMMF. My making a point through crude humour and then having that point missed is becoming a theme :)
well, technically you beat me to it but just noting that, in my own drivelling way, I made the same point.
-
• #308
100 posts, in your face, bitch.
Is 'beating me to it' more random crude humour?
-
• #309
It would be cutting satire, ironic allusion. It's lost on some people.
-
• #310
Slab!
-
• #311
jamboree
rorocromobogory.
drat
alfalfa
punto
crease
chamois
tramampoline.
-
• #312
werd
-
• #313
'Invent'. Shows itself up to be a favourite again and again.
-
• #314
Add it to your inventory*.
*I'm appalled that I even conceived of that Schick-Pun, or "Schun", let alone typed it into digital posterity.
-
• #315
BMMF in venting of pun self-denial shocker. :)
-
• #316
Slab!
fine word.
-
• #317
Svelte
-
• #318
recrudescence
quinquagenery
From a Geoffrey Wheatcroft column in yesterday's Guardian.
-
• #319
regurgitation.
-
• #320
Brick ...for some unknown reason
-
• #321
crinkle-crankle
Apparently its a type of wall.
-
• #322
Refulgence
-
• #323
parachutist
i just like saying it -
• #324
tramampoline.
TRAMPAMPOLINE!
Phlogiston. Having come across it agian in that elements doc on BBC4 a while back i couldn't stop saying it over for a week or so afterwards. Phlogiston. I named a quiz after it, tried to re-name a band after it, shoehorned it into emails and conversations just so I could say it again. Phlogiston.
[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory[/ame]
Phlogiston.
-
• #325
crenel
I mean that the reification of language as divorced from its 'meaning', no matter how contested that idea might be, is a sort of fetishism. And I don't agree that words are always 'things', at all – I think words are only 'things' in one sense: the material fact of the marks on the page, as pure sign. A 'word' needs to be a compound of sign and signified to work as a signifier. So in what sense is a verbal utterance without an abstract referent a 'word' at all? Of course this is all complicated. It's a sign of how thrilling my Friday nights are that I'm discussing semibloodyotics, frankly. You're a lapsed linguist, BMMF? Interesting.