-
• #85777
It’s meant in the sense that the presenters have a long history of being bitches to each other, to the extent of numerous Ofcom complaints, rather than the bitches and ho’s epithet. And if you’ve got a problem with the baggy bit you must have been absolutely outraged when you first found out about that program’s actual title
-
• #85778
Righto
-
• #85779
no way , man! let em froth.
-
• #85780
We're through the looking glass here, people.
1 Attachment
-
• #85781
.
1 Attachment
-
• #85782
Thought it had a certain Dr Breen vibe too
1 Attachment
-
• #85783
-
• #85784
.
1 Attachment
-
• #85785
Stolen.
-
• #85786
Did @Fatberg write this?
-
• #85787
See the Trump thread or just all of this forum.
-
• #85788
I didn’t. But it resonates man.
-
• #85789
hehe
-
• #85790
.
1 Attachment
-
• #85791
Ha!
-
• #85792
-
1 Attachment
-
• #85793
-
• #85795
I think I'll do this...
-
• #85796
-
• #85797
Has Matt ever been funny?
-
• #85798
Private Eye is reporting that Telegraph cartoonist Matt receives an eye-watering £650,000 per year plus perks – actually £200,000 more than the Telegraph editor.
Why so much?
The fear is that Matt could be poached by The Daily Mail or The Times and take a considerable amount of readers with him.
-
• #85799
an eye-watering £650,000 per year
Gross revenue from 892 seven-day print subscriptions, so maybe not as eye-watering as all that.
-
• #85800
We used to commission Robert Thompson on one of my old mags, I think we paid him £120 for what was maybe an hours work every week, he was very fucking quick...
I think it's just the nature of the genre, some gentle, not very funny, wit...
That's so shit it's amazing.