-
• #101102
geological time scale
But the timescale that matters is the lifetime of those we care about.
-
• #101103
I think it will happen well before we can get to Mars or somewhere habitable without a dying sun. Space exploration is a dead end.
-
• #101104
1 Attachment
-
• #101105
Sort-of dead ends that are cracking you up at the moment
-
• #101106
Existential crises that are cracking me up.
-
• #101107
Existential crises that are cracking you up
1 Attachment
-
• #101108
Existential crises that are cracking me up.
We're going with the floe.
-
• #101109
Existential crises that are cracking me up.
Cracking up like the East Antarctic ice sheet, am I right?
-
• #101110
Making our planet completely uninhabitable for all human life, isn't quite the same thing as unihabitable for all life. Life is amazing, it will find a way to survive , it's just ego on our part to think if we go, it all goes. It the great scheme of things humans could mearly be a footnote in the story of this planet.
Millions of years from now super inteligent cockroaches will be digging bit of us up and wondering how we managed with so few legs.
-
• #101111
.
1 Attachment
-
• #101112
the timescale that matters is the lifetime of those we care about
People who are alive today will all be dead soon.
-
• #101113
Making our planet completely uninhabitable for all human life, isn't...
...as easy as you think. Humans are very adaptable and omnivorous. As long as something is alive on earth, there will be people around to kill it and eat it.
-
• #101114
So good
-
• #101115
Wonder what the range of survivable temperature for humans is like compared to, say, cockroaches. Seems like it’d be a lot narrower. Although we have the ability to use technology to create artificial environments I suppose.
-
• #101116
It's a pretty varied planet and we survive in some of the hottest and coldest parts of it, but surviving and flourishing are quite different.
-
• #101117
I’ve been to Finland and those fuckers aren’t flourishing.
-
• #101118
.
-
• #101119
Yup
1 Attachment
-
• #101120
Wonder what the range of survivable temperature for humans is like compared to, say, cockroaches. Seems like it’d be a lot narrower
Without heating or air conditioning, it's not great, but just clothing and shelter which we've had for many millennia are good for -40°C to +40°C. Cockroaches are rubbish at low temperatures, you can kill them in a domestic freezer. Some invertebrates can survive excursions down to -80°C, but actually living requires temperatures well above freezing.
-
• #101121
You could definitely eliminate all further anthropogenic effects on climate by killing all humans, but that may not be the most palatable solution politically.
Jared Diamond shared a theory in Guns, Germs and Steel that the mini ice age in the sixteenth century was caused by the deaths of 95 percent of the inhabitants of the Americas from diseases following Columbus, leading to widespread re-vegetation that caused climate change. That may have been discredited now.
-
• #101122
Some invertebrates can survive excursions down to -80°C
-
• #101123
I read that theory in the Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jan/31/european-colonization-of-americas-helped-cause-climate-change Great connection to the freezing of the Thames
-
• #101124
Genghis Khan killed 10% of the world's population at the time, causing climate change for a couple of hundred years. Climate hero.
-
• #101125
Jared Diamond … may have been discredited now.
This
Our extinction is a certainty either way. I don't think consciousness has much bearing on the matter. The extreme adaptability of humans is likely to defer their extinction as a species, but not by a significant amount on the geological time scale.