-
• #15552
Shoe Express x Lidl...
-
• #15553
Clarks x M&S...
-
• #15554
Do not want. Plus, why not use scotch bonnets in the photo?!
-
• #15555
Cuz an intern took that photo, that's why...
-
• #15556
Such art direction.
-
• #15557
Totting up what I see in that picture I reckon that shoot cost about a fiver...
That includes the shoes...
Am I right?
/pundog.jpg/
-
• #15558
yeah
dont even know their chillies
fux sake
punters -
• #15559
Yeah they're cack but the FP Superstars are badass.
-
• #15560
Annoying that they seemingly made a billion of each release though rather than the 300 from 10 years ago
-
• #15561
i guess for everyone who missed out first time...
Isawyoucoming.jpg
-
• #15562
Nope...
-
• #15563
very good. big fan of the Unions also
-
• #15564
yeah I knew those Brooks would get that reaction - thing is there will be a queue outside Hanon from about 4am onwards, guaranteed
-
• #15566
People are just queuing to resell. Fuckers.
In other news; found a pair of these I forgot I'd bought...
-
• #15567
^Ooo what is? You do seem to jump from brilliance to shite. I guess yo are about exclusivity/collab/resell over taste. B-)
-
• #15568
Url says Alvin. They not as 'pleasing' in other pics...
-
• #15569
Pls to explain the superstar thing?
-
• #15570
Adidas desperately try to kickstart a trend, gullible 'heads' fall for it, the end...
-
• #15571
Like.
-
• #15572
Trying to get that "orthopaedic look" back into mainstream fashion.
Spezial, Gazelle, Samba, Nastase, Stan Smith, Busenitz, Boston, LA Trainer and a lot of other shoes from that era were solid. Even the first wacky torsions were good at the time.
Superstars on the other hand only look good when opting for the full Run DMC look.
-
• #15573
£105?
-
• #15574
Good post day.
1 Attachment
And those Etonic earlier. Don't think they didn't make me want to vomit.