-
• #9152
This has shot up on my wantage list:
That ti? Oooh...
-
• #9153
Looks like it.
Looks a bit dated. The finish on that bracelet will show your fingerprints like a bitch which would royally fuck me off.
SS version
-
• #9154
for £2.5k I can think of a few better pieces.
I do like their Mark XVI & XVII pilots though - absolutely timeless.
-
• #9155
absolutely timeless.
I think I'd want my money back if that were the case.
-
• #9156
ha!
-
• #9157
Looks like it.
Looks a bit dated. The finish on that bracelet will show your fingerprints like a bitch which would royally fuck me off.
Being TI, scratches quickly oxidize and become masked. I'm already regretting the PVD finish on my watch :(
-
• #9158
One of the few modern Omegas I do like:
-
• #9159
^ Guy I sit next to in the office has this. Its a chunky piece as in biiiiig depth case, looks the part.
-
• #9160
In looks, I think the IWC (minus the chunk of the bezel) just about takes it.
-
• #9161
Which models are you referring to?
The submariner ape on the front page of their site... £575 was the price I found on a UK stockist. The Steinhart Ocean One w/ ceramic bezel is only €380 pinch postage.
-
• #9162
The submariner ape on the front page of their site... £575 was the price I found on a UK stockist. The Steinhart Ocean One w/ ceramic bezel is only €380 pinch postage.
Ocean One really is a submariner ape / homage but I wouldn't have said the same about the Davosa Argonautic. Just because no Mercedes hands, different style case / bezel plus a Helium escape.
Probably closer to an Omega Co-axial Seamaster on those fronts but still looks quite different.
-
• #9163
Fair enough... I totally agree that the Ocean One is an ape / homage to the Submariner. I just meant that the helium valve isn't enough (for me) to justify the difference in price.
Having said that, I do really like the bezel with the yellow on. It reminds me of one of my favourite IWCs:
-
• #9164
Aquatimers are the shit.
Too big though. 44mm ! fuck that.
-
• #9165
Yup... never be able to wear one but they are very pretty!!
-
• #9166
They are properly bling too IMO.
-
• #9167
The new ones are not a patch on the the previous two models.
The Cousteau non chrono is a corker IMHO.
http://www.rruegger.ch/images/iwc_aquatimer/iwc_aquatimer_cousteau_sihh.JPG
-
• #9168
Aquatimers are the shit.
Too big though. 44mm ! fuck that.
Take that back...
44mm is perfect!
-
• #9169
^ for people with fat wrists, sure.
-
• #9170
This page needs rescuing,
-
• #9171
Go on then...
-
• #9172
^ often copied, never equalled.
Diesel need to be here somewhere to. Functional, and manly.
Agh, my fucking eyes.
Diesel :-D
I imagine if it had been created by Hublot there'd be less snobery. It is fucking huge though. I'd actually taken some pictures of this range for BainMaker and his obese wrist.
-
• #9174
Looks like Tudor are really stepping out of Rolex's shadow.
Review: The Tudor Pelagos on Vimeo
The bracelet is really something.
Yeah, found it elsewhere as a 3707. The 3727 is also pretty nice (no date window).
Don't like the text at the top though.