-
• #3752
^^ sadly it's quartz schmortz
-
• #3753
pretty though...
-
• #3754
the triangles are poo
-
• #3755
anyone know of a (not too expensive) single handed watch? You know, gans right round from 1 - 24?
-
• #3756
What's "not too expensive"?
-
• #3760
^^ sadly it's quartz schmortz
I wondered because the second hand was 'in between'... Nice thing, the old US servicemen's watches are pretty...
-
• #3761
-
• #3762
what brand is that one?
-
• #3763
Ventura
-
• #3764
http://www.ventura-watches.com/index/index/tag/Ambassadors
As worn by uri geller.
-
• #3765
I'm looking for a new every day watch to protect my Tag that I'm currently wearing as it has huge sentimental value, and this has really caught my eye
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61Cx%2BpqwGTL._AA1063_.jpg -
• #3766
Bit steampunk, no?
-
• #3767
did you win that R______, jose?
-
• #3768
What's "not too expensive"?
£100 - 150?
And those three are all a bit too fussy for me. Should have been more specific I know.
-
• #3769
Cant believe you guys have made me like (some) Seikos.
Now have my eye on a 70's diver on fleabay -
• #3770
cheap seiko autos have now become the accepted forum watch.
-
• #3772
cheap seiko autos have now become the accepted forum watch.
There's nothing cheap about a decent Seiko auto young man.
-
• #3773
hey, i have one. it was about 30 quid. that's a cheap auto.
-
• #3774
Movement: mechanical, manual winding with tourbillon.
Am I missing something? Does that mean for $109K you still have to wind the watch yourself?
-
• #3775
did you win that R______, jose?
Finishes later today...
•crosses fingers, sets a Google reminder*
http://www.soph.net/news/2011/10/sophhankyu_mens_tokyo_opening_items.html