-
• #27
I wonder what the sum of all the "+1" posts is.
+repped.
-
• #28
498,564
-
• #29
If I make 7 more posts between now and 500,000 I'll have contributed 1/500th of those posts.. This is my 993rd
-
• #30
4% ftw!
-
• #31
I wonder what the sum of all the "+1" posts is.
Of posts that just contain "+1", 133. Nowhere near as high as I'd have expected.
But then... there's probably a load where it's +1 and then a comment.
Of positive reputation comments, which now are considered "+1", 5,007. Which is a little higher than I would have expected.
-
• #32
4% ftw!
Ha!
-
• #33
The URL up the top there says "post502177".. does this mean 500,000 has already passed us by?
-
• #34
Of positive reputation comments, which now are considered "+1", 5,007. Which is a little higher than I would have expected.
Do you mean comments through the rep/comments mechanism or actual posts?
-
• #35
The URL up the top there says "post502177".. does this mean 500,000 has already passed us by?
Yes and no. The post numbers include all of the spam and stuff that gets deleted, so we have passed 500,000, but we do not actually have 500,000 posts.
The number on the front page is how many posts exist in the system.
Do you mean comments through the rep/comments mechanism or actual posts?
I counted both:
In posts: 133
In rep/comments: 5,007 -
• #36
It would be good to see how many posts contain the words:
cunt
FTW
HipsterMaybe the % of Objects posts that contain the word "cunt"
-
• #37
Or the % of other people's posts that contain both "object" and "cunt." ;)
-
• #38
1,098 posts contain the word cunt.
FTW is too short to search.
705 posts contain the word hipster.
219 of the 6,398 posts by that user contain the word cunt, which makes up 3.4% of that users posts. -
• #39
Is that all? How sad.
-
• #40
very! I was hoping for at least 30%, and 3.4% is shocking. he must be getting mellow!
-
• #41
He is mellow. A total teddy bear really.
-
• #42
The average is 0.2%! He's 17 times above average. Still pretty good for him. The rest of us need to work harder (I had 16 hits).
-
• #43
ha ha good spot Horatio
-
• #44
(I'm going to regret saying this) What's my cunt ratio? :)
-
• #45
(I'm going to regret saying this) What's my cunt ratio? :)
221 out of 21,000, a mere 1%
-
• #46
So I'm not as foul.. wait.. that's more than Object's total. Ha!!
Ha! The Cunt
-
• #47
So I'm not as foul.. wait.. that's more than Object's total. Ha!!
Ha! The Cunt
I'm sure you've abbreviated far more as well.. WAC
-
• #48
and don't forget the cuntingmotherfucking combos!
-
• #49
cunt* brings up 1488.
-
• #50
Are 'whatacunt' links included?
I've always wondered about the active time thing with google analytics as well.
I think the increase in unique visitors + drop in time spent is probably explained by the jump in lfgss.com in google search results for almost everything you can ever imagine wanting to search. When you're after specific information (rather than just browsing) you spend less time on each site.