No God

This advert is the one that suprised me the most though.

1 Attachment

This advert is the one that suprised me the most though.

:)

Should really have been "stop worrying and enjoy your bike".

:)

Should really have been "stop worrying and enjoy your bike".

Just goes to show how dull those agearists are.

but still, I've enjoyed my infuriating diversion from my impending essay.
genetics of leukaemic stem cell progenitors anyone?

genetics of leukaemic stem cell progenitors

Bless you.

good, i'm glad my lack of vocabulary skills is being used as a device to attack my arguments, i'm sure i'd be better if i had time to read something other than scientific journals.

Not at all, your ideas are being challenged not your written skills.

The point about vested interest, is more scientific fact.

Really this is such a silly idea of yours that we should clear it up, I suspect we both agree on this but are wording it differently (in fact I find it hard to comprehend that any one can actually hold your claimed view).

In response to my refuting some of the criticism levelled at Dawkins, you say:

*"but why defend him if you don't support him. - I won't defend any belief or proponent of any beleif unless i have a vested interest in it."
*
Can I ask you a simple question, if we were debating against an American Neo-Nazi of some kind (it's about time the Nazis were marched into this thread) and someone on your side of the argument, made the claim, when attacking this American Neo-Nazi, that during the second world war the Nazis invaded North America and committed wide scale destruction and carnage - would you step in and point out his error ?

Or would you let the conversation continue down an entirely fictitious channel of attack against this Neo-Nazi fella', because you are in no way invested in nor share his beliefs ?

arguing with you tynan is infuriatingly dull, all you do is repeat your islam homosexual argument and expect that to cover all bases.

Only earlier you were saying "its the way you insult the, in most cases, christian belief." ?

I like turtles.

I like turtles.

Gentile.

genetics of leukaemic stem cell progenitors anyone?

No, they're boring, in fact they're all shellfish, I mean, selfish, anyway.

I like turtles.

fucking LOVE turtles!!!

Keep your turtle threads on bikeradar, please.

Did someone mention the second coming. Guess who has returned...

Keep your turtle threads on turtleradar, please.

http://www.reptileforums.co.uk/shelled-turtles-tortoise/

I hate turtles.

What do you mean, 'bikeradar'? Is that the name of your turtle?

http://www.reptileforums.co.uk/shelled-turtles-tortoise/

It's amazing how people can have a web forum on something as boring as turtles and tortoises. Oh wait, we have one on bikes.

I've said it once but i'll say it clearer,
you are deluding yourself if you think that you can enter an argument without a vested interest in winning.
Or making a point against something you see as unfair, you still have a vested interest in it.

tynan your post further backs up my statement, all you can do is make a personal attack and conceal your lack of argument with a poorly thought through parable.
and yes I know that last part was a personal attack.

now, can we get to the serious point, as i've haddock enough of this

so can anyone tell me if In adverts about religion then you can't say 'there is a/god', it has to say 'there probably is a god' ?

same reason Carlsberg is probably the worst beer in the world.

I've said it once but i'll say it clearer,
you are deluding yourself if you think that you can enter an argument without a vested interest in winning.

You would seem to have changed you argument from:

"I won't defend any belief or proponent of any beleif unless i have a vested interest in it."

To:

"I won't defend any belief or proponent of any beleif unless i have a vested interest in winning the argument."

Is this a fair understanding of your position ?

tynan your post further backs up my statement, all you can do is make a personal attack and conceal your lack of argument with a poorly thought through parable.

Oddly I try not to make any argument unnecessarily personal, I usually challenge or refute an idea I see as wrong, I am less interested who the person making it is.

My post above as worst calls your idea silly, if it came from anyone I would call the idea silly.

so can anyone tell me if In adverts about religion then you can't say 'there is a/god', it has to say 'there probably is a god' ?

That would be the logical result of a successful challenge against the atheist bus campaign.

But of course the ASA will eventually rule something to the effect that they have no opinion on the matter of whether god exists or not, so I doubt it will go much further.

I've seen adverts before saying god will help me, I just though I was being offered a once in a lifetime offer to wear a Druid costume, drink some cianide in a room with other aimless teens and all leaping to level 2 ;)

Can I ask you a simple question, if we were debating against an American Neo-Nazi of some kind (it's about time the Nazis were marched into this thread) and someone on your side of the argument, made the claim, when attacking this American Neo-Nazi, that during the second world war the Nazis invaded North America and committed wide scale destruction and carnage - would you step in and point out his error ?

Or would you let the conversation continue down an entirely fictitious channel of attack against this Neo-Nazi fella', because you are in no way invested in nor share his beliefs ?

Only earlier you were saying "its the way you insult the, in most cases, christian belief." ?

Godwins Law has come into play.

oh, god

Godwins Law has come into play.

I was surprised it took so long, when it comes to religion I expect a decent showing of the Nazis by the end of page one !

Daveypants, you say you are a Christian, can I ask you whether you believe in life after death ?

religion gives people a sense of orderliness in their lives... the other stuff is just a belief.