-
• #26802
Why would you want to be any of these clowns?
-
• #26803
Ew, is that really necessary?! Also it's a bit unfair to compare Major with Blair and Thatcher. This is the man who gave us the National Lottery, Black Wednesday and the privatisation of the railways...
Obviously you wouldn't, but picking up a car that was fit for Prime Minister's and the Queen* not long ago for a bag of sand is cracking value for money. Especially when it's perfect for motorway wafting.
*Actually she had a Daimler branded version but that's probably splitting hairs.
-
• #26804
See I know the Megane, looks slightly unconventional, but it flicks my switches. But thanks I hadn't thought of it, but's it's not going to sway me.
-
• #26805
Because it doesn't look as nice, I don't always have to be practical and I'll have killed it by the time they get big.
-
• #26806
P5?
-
• #26807
And, for reasons I can't even start to explain, I'm just not a Merc chap.
Fair enough.
If you want a forced induction estate with 500bhp that isn't an Audi or Merc, I'm out of ideas.
Unless you want a new 550i and a remap...
-
• #26808
Jag?
-
• #26809
Estate?
Not actually an estate but 550bhp, 174mph and LWB:
http://www.jaguarusa.com/all-models/xj/xj-models/xjr-lwb.htmlI imagine they are rather pricey though.
-
• #26810
What are servicing bills/problems likely to be? I want some budget wafting...
-
• #26811
Jag?
Oh yeh. You could get a black one and put a light blue stripe over it.
-
• #26812
I had a 172 Cup and it was brilliant.
You have to be prepared for people to take the piss until you get them out in it.
I didn't have it long so can't really comment on reliability but it was a lot of fun and I had no problems with it.
-
• #26813
V12 with a few mods gets the bhp....
-
• #26814
Basic servicing and sell if anything major happens.
https://www.gumtree.com/p/jaguar/jaguar-xj-3.2-xj8-4dr/1155870058
-
• #26815
That's why I keep on coming back to the RS6. Forced induction isn't a must, so the M5 Touring is still an option, but I do still fancy a V10. With turbos.
-
• #26817
I still quite fancy a C6 RS6 Avant, 570 bhp would be a noticeable upgrade on the Volvo.
Looks like they're around £30,000, from a quick scan of eBay.
-
• #26818
Which would be enough for three 996 911's.
-
• #26819
Had a good day pulling this apart, still loads more to do but finding the engine to be quite clean and the front end to be solid was really nice.
Finding out I'll probably have to cut out and replace the sills was a bit of a bummer as its a long job but luckily the replacement panels are super cheap.
3 Attachments
-
• #26820
Jaguar main dealers are going to be pricey. If you buy a car with a FSH from main dealers you're probably going to want to keep it up, but independents are going to be a lot cheaper.
If you go XJ6 the AJ6 straight six is a very reliable engine if properly maintained and not difficult to work on. If you go XJ8 the AJ-V8 is also reliable (it's still in production). You will read stuff about nikasil engine linings in pre-2000 models being eroded by high sulphur fuel between the start of 2000 and summer 2000 when the sulphur content in UK fuel was reduced, but in reality this is pretty much ancient history and any problems would have revealed themselves by now! It should be easy to check anyway as there's a plaque on replacement engines.
The 'sealed for life' ZF gearbox which is not actually sealed for life is also worth knowing about, and a much more pressing problem IMO. There are cheaper ways to get it serviced here but the definitive way is to take it back to ZF in Dortmund for a service:
http://www.bimmerboard.com/forums/posts/527361(That article is well worth anyone reading just for the engineering/photos!)
But all in they are (broadly) well built, reliable cars that did well in J.D. Power surveys.
Bear in mind I've never actually owned my own car, I'm just a bit obsessed with 90s Jags :)
-
• #26821
I've heard of some unusual obsessions, but 90's Jags is takes the biscuit.
-
• #26822
Grace, space and pace... I'd prefer a '90 or '91 X-JS ideally but an XJ8 would be a lot more practical.
-
• #26823
The XJS was an abysmal car - it was only saved by the later ones being pretty good, but it took them a hell of a long time to get right.
-
• #26824
My 1983 XJ6 changed my view on what I wanted from a day-to-day car. Up until that point I thought I wanted a sportscar. Turns out what I really wanted was a wafty old 3 speed auto with lovely tall tyres and a torquey but basically gutless 4.2. If it wasn't for the whole 22mpg thing an XJ6 is the car I'd have for everyday use.
-
• #26825
22mpg sounds like a lot.
Would admittedly need a lot more fuel than a 3 series or a Honda thingy.