Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

Jesus Rik, 1001 pics in a row? You ok hermano? Maybe you need some fresh air or hug maybe?

Rik rules! :D

Terrifying.

These days crack whores will give you a terrible case of orange aerospoke & bullhorn syndrome.

Terrifying.

These days crack whores will give you a terrible case of orange aerospoke & bullhorn syndrome.

god that is horrible an aesthetically and conceptually poor set of pictures. technically shite too

repostrepostrepost..snortysnorty...but keep on she is a sexy....

I'm takin my fixie to SWEDEN!!!!!!!!

mFT

And Japan .....

MFT

^ welcome to our newest member. Balki; this guy got out of the nursery? I blame you!

he has to sign his name at the end of every post so that he remembers that it was he what written it

MJ

Rik rules! :D

you rule from the shadows! ;)

Fasteddy, you really are a strange individual.

You call me a hypocrite then fail to say why.

You make a dig about me to another member, then don't understand why I take offence at that.

To my memory, you haven't posted any objectionable images on this thread, yet take it personally when people complain about other people posting such images.

But worst of all, you haven't seemed to grasp the fact that a lot of members - both male and female - find the images posted on this thread distasteful .

You're weird maaaaaan, but I guess this is the internet after all.

Mooks, I called you a hypocrite because you posted that you'd checked other forumengers profiles to check their post history shortly after critcising me for checking your previous posts. I think this may be fairly common behaviour used to better understanding of the person you are talking too.
but just to prove the point.....

I think I'm done with this site - this thread has ruined it for me.
...... you're still here! (In case you didn't understand, that was a shallow attempt at humour, you may collect your toys from the floor now.)

'You make a dig about me to another member, then don't understand why I take offence at that.'
Already explained here: http://www.londonfgss.com/post610776-1756.html

'To my memory, you haven't posted any objectionable images on this thread, yet take it personally when people complain about other people posting such images.'

That's because I haven't posted any. I don't take it personally. What I've done is to point out that just as you don't like some of the images posted I don't like the way you have dealt with this issue and those who posted the images. I have recognised from the outset that some members find some of the images distasteful, it is a shame that you still can't recognise that my issue is not with the validity of the images but with your pious attitude. FYI I'd rather be a little weird and a 'strange individual' than have to carry that bag of King Edwards that resides on your shoulder.

Mooks, I called you a hypocrite because you posted that you'd checked other forumengers profiles to check their post history shortly after critcising me for checking your previous posts. I think this may be fairly common behaviour used to better understanding of the person you are talking too.
but just to prove the point.....

Hypocrisy fail...

I would be a hypocrite if I'd said what I did (that most of the regular posters to this thread don't contribute to other parts of the site), when in fact I didn't contribute anything to the site myself.

My criticism of you was the fact that you referred to my post history to undermine my position. If that's not 'argumentum ad hominem' I don't know what is.

At the end of the day though, if someone was saying 'that mooks is a top bloke' and you turned round and - within my earshot - said 'no - he's a cunt', I think I'd be well within my rights to feel aggrieved. That said, if you did look at my posts and feel that they were just as distasteful as a girl on a bike with her tits out, I'd be more than willing to think long and hard about what I'd done.

What I've done is to point out that just as you don't like some of the images posted I don't like the way you have dealt with this issue and those who posted the images. I have recognised from the outset that some members find some of the images distasteful, it is a shame that you still can't recognise that my issue is not with the validity of the images but with your pious attitude. FYI I'd rather be a little weird and a 'strange individual' than have to carry that bag of King Edwards that resides on your shoulder.

If you find my posting pious and condescending, that's your problem. I'm not going to be shamed into not posting just because I happen to see more than two tits and a hole when I see a woman.

yawn

@ fasteddy and Mooks.

agree to disagree and move on. The internets ain't the place to be having moral arguments.

I'm not going to be shamed into not posting just because I happen to see more than two tits and a hole when I see a woman.

Hats off Mooks, i barely see past the first tit. i admire your professionalism in this area

@ BRM

Dartcar cornie "fuck me!" ?

first one's right.

#1

has been for years

don't really like the tough-stickers.

:D

is it just me, or does it only take a bike and a couple of tatts on a (preferably a south east asian) girl, to make most of you pantie-sniffers like men out of prison?

.

Hearing fail, not you sighing , probablay more hot arse-wind emitting from your mouth.....

<
Hypocrisy fail...

I would be a hypocrite..........>.

If you feel the need to answer the case, there probably is a case.

<
At the end of the day though, if someone was saying 'that mooks is a top bloke' and you turned round and - within my earshot - said 'no - he's a cunt', I think I'd be well within my rights to feel aggrieved. That said, if you did look at my posts and feel that they were just as distasteful as a girl on a bike with her tits out, I'd be more than willing to think long and hard about what I'd done.

If you find my posting pious and condescending, that's your problem. I'm not going to be shamed into not posting just because I happen to see more than two tits and a hole when I see a woman.

This last part is really cheap of you. You use the C word (Which many find distastful) in quotation marks to imply I might have said similar(Utterly false), then 'two tits and a hole' (Which many may find distastful) to imply that is what those you rail against see when they look at a women. Of course you are way above that because you see so much more, you truly are very special.

don't really like the tough-stickers.

i can live with em ;)

Dartford can poor-choice of Tshirt

@ fasteddy and Mooks.

agree to disagree and move on. The internets ain't the place to be having moral arguments.

Yes it is.