Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

Posted on
Page
of 184
  • love that number, i was actually listening to that this morning, then humming it riding home

  • Let's hope this gets me some points with 'ver lads'


    1 Attachment

    • Adv-Replay_@Vanity-Fair-n_39-2006_crop.jpg
  • I find it quite funny that so many people objected to me posting a load of harmless bollocks a few months ago when they could have just pressed the ignore button or simply used their brains to ignore it, yet now that theyre posting a load of objectionable bollocks that objectifies women, and is clearly bordering on offensive, theyre using the same defence that i was using, i.e. "If you dont like it, ignore it"... hmmm... why is it ok to post stuff that is clearly distasteful, but its not ok for me or anyone else to post a load of inane but harmless bollocks?

  • I find it quite funny that so many people objected to me posting a load of harmless bollocks a few months ago when they could have just pressed the ignore button or simply used their brains to ignore it, yet now that theyre posting a load of objectionable bollocks that objectifies women, and is clearly bordering on offensive, theyre using the same defence that i was using, i.e. "If you dont like it, ignore it"... hmmm... why is it ok to post stuff that is clearly distasteful, but its not ok for me or anyone else to post a load of inane but harmless bollocks?

    I enjoyed your bollocks, fnar fnar.

  • You deduced all that about me from a few posts on an internet forum? You would be a fucking psychic if one word of it was accurate, but it isn't, so you're just an idiot. You're not just an idiot because you came to such staggeringly inaccurate conclusions about me, you're an idiot because you think you are even in a position to come to any such conclusions based on a couple of hundred words written by somebody about whom you know nothing. You're not even bright enough to take my entire contribution to this thread in the round, something which might have saved you from such an embarrassing pratfall.

    By the way, I have seen the groups of men you describe; I know some of the women whose job involves putting up with them all evening ithout reacting, and they hold them in a contempt borne of far more creditable experience than your silly PC posturing. Holding them in such vicarious contempt (personally, I find them ridiculous, more than contemptible), I would hardly want to gain their approbation by adopting a similar disposition, and if I did I hardly think LFGSS is the kind of place they'd hang out waiting to be impressed by me.

    I don't really give much of a shit about your line that I'm an idiot, as you seem to have been an easy victim of the kind of tricks you reckon you pull - namely, getting a rise out of people. One mention of Chris Moyles and it's all hot indignation. Good. I reckon I stand pretty well with the fair few people on here who I actually care about not to worry too much over whatever it is you think I've embarrassed myself about, whether they agree with me on this matter or not.

    The top and bottom of it is if you post here, the words you post will speak for you. The nature of your posts will speak for you. As your few posts are all I've had to go on, all I can do is presume you're the kind of nob who rates girls in terms of how fuckable he thinks they are, tells girls to get back to the kitchen and says stuff like "She'd get it". Start acknowledging that your internet offerings serve as the impression people will get of you in real time. If you come across like a nob in any social situation, it's only more nobbish to say something along the lines of "you don't know me" when other people are only responding to what you have shown them. And you haven't posted anything to the contrary for my money as far as I can recall.

    The fact that you're now in the position of defending yourself, btw, is because you chose to identify yourself as the cause of "pointless feminist..." whatever. My original post had been a general one and I hadn't even been that fussed who started it in this instance; as I said in it, there seem to be few photos of girls that pass these days without some talk about which of them is most fuckable. The reason why you are now engaged in a to-and-fro is because you decided to make my general comment specific to yourself.

    One thing is properly getting on my tits about you though. You talk about "posturing", most recently my "silly pc posturing". You're going to have to get your head round the fact that what I espouse are my considered views, not some airy-fairy conformism so I can be seen as right-on. You're going to have to get your head round the fact that there are plenty of men who are contemptuous of, not amused by and complicitous in, oafish sexual flippancy towards women. The fact you see a male who espouses such views as merely trotting out some pc forelock-tugging shows you up to be exactly the kind of person I said existed here: sneering and bigotted. I know exactly where I am in my views: your indignant defence of yours while muddying your position further suggests that you do not.

  • And you haven't posted anything to the contrary for my money as far as I can recall.

    Your powers of recall are weak; how much money, and where do I collect?

    http://www.londonfgss.com/post556183-839.html

    http://www.londonfgss.com/post571984-1048.html

    are a little more nuanced than the satirical posts which have got your goat, mainly because you are so humorless that you don't recognise satire, such as

    http://www.londonfgss.com/post558582-888.html

    when it's staring you (particularly you, in the case of the above post) in the face.

    I will refrain from further analysis of your manifold errors, as I am reminded of pig wrestling every time I see one of your diatribes, and while I am not averse to a bit of genuinely sporting pig wrestling, I find little challenge in a battle of wits with an unarmed man.

    Two ungulates in one post; set your psychic psychoanalytic powers on that!

  • well forgive me on recall - all I associate your name with is your thread about what different willies look like in lycra. Still, from the three posts you've gone and dug out to support your sense of being in the right, one of them states something fairly neutral/obvious and two of them, despite your intentions, still don't nuance particularly well in support of whatever point it is you're trying to make about yourself being a jolly good egg. You come across as a male apologist at best. And what you see as the very razor's edge of sharp satire may not be to others.

    As far as the pig wrestling "image" goes, I'm afraid I'm very much the half-naked farmhand in this scenario. You're the one doing all the wriggling around, squealing in protestation; I'm onto you and I'm holding nice and firm thanks. But you're still making it all about you, rather than the subject, which is what I was actually posting about in the first place. Don't let's make it all about you and in doing so lose sight of the valid point I was making, yeah?

    Rating women cyclists out of five in terms of how much you would give them a good fucking is offensive to plenty of people on here and often considered worthy of contempt. And if you can't get your head round why that should be a cue for at least some sort of self-moderation on this forum, try and imagine all the girls on the forum posting group pictures of boys on the forum in their lycra or in their civvies but in any case on their bikes and then loudly and gleefully and constantly posting their opinions of which they would fuck first, second, third and fourth. And imagine you were always the one they took the piss out of for being ugly, small-cocked and insignificant. And all you'd been doing was riding your bike as a cycle enthusiast. I'd be making just as much fuss about that as this. The difference is the girls aren't doing that, and there are now incredibly few of them who even look on the forum, many of them having grown tired of the casual sexism that persists on here.

  • By Christ you people write some shit!

    Man up FFS

  • Here's a new one...

  • I think I'm done with this site - this thread has ruined it for me.

  • pajamas! you're a dude. plus fucking one.

    mitre tester! if you can't see why rating girls in a photo is laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame, you need to get a brain, moran

    now fuck off back to your Nuts magazine reading colleagues and retarded office banter

  • Despite the lameness of this thread, can I just say that I love those soft hairs on womens arms. I really like to stroke them, it makes me feel all tickly. Does that make me weird?

  • can I just say that I love those soft hairs on womens arms. I really like to stroke them, it makes me feel all tickly. Does that make me weird?

    No....just high on the restraining order list! ;)

  • No....just high on the restraining order list! ;)

    lol well I already am banned from using a camera in public, or going within 50m of ANY woman ;)

    seriously though man, rubbing your cheeks (face cheeks obviously, not butt cheeks) on a girls furry soft forearms, its a nice comforting sensation

  • seriously though man, rubbing your cheeks (face cheeks obviously, not butt cheeks) on a girls furry soft forearms, its a nice comforting sensation

    Well your girlfriend sure agrees!

  • guys, if you get to discuss shit, get your own thread, this one is for pics

    thanks

    FFS i star to get bored of so much lame around here

  • WOW.... You have been busy Rik!

  • As its originally Fast Eddys thread about my pictures I say let the pictures continue. From previous posts we have all gathred that certain people dont agree with it. I dont know why they are still looking at it in that case!
    Got nothing else to do and want to cause arguments???

  • I already know it is repost, thanks

  • but i like all the same

  • if you don't like it, don't look

About

Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

Posted by Avatar for fasteddy @fasteddy

Actions