-
• #89927
Does anyone here live in the former East Germany? Do Afd supporters privately think of themselves as Nazis? Are people blaming Afd's success on Merkel, for inviting a million Syrians?
-
• #89928
Friends have 5 cats, the live in a larger house and converted thier garden to cat friendly so the cats can't escape.
If I had the space I'd have more cats. If I had the money I'd want to open an animal sanctuary....
-
• #89929
Classed as an extremist party.
They have swapped hatred of Jews for hatred of Muslims.
-
• #89930
Kid has no chance..
1 Attachment
-
• #89931
I thought that. Poor kid.
-
• #89932
Isn't there a shortage in scaffolders?
-
• #89933
in Thüringen rather than in Germany
And all other parties have refused to form a coalition with them.
-
• #89934
What’s wrong with scaffolding? Job for life, decent pay and scope to travel the world if you’re particularly skilled.
Check your privilege. -
• #89935
That's my point, that kid has a chance to fit right in.
-
• #89936
They also looked pretty strong in Sachsen.
And I don't have high hopes for the next National election.
@lynx there's a big part that's just normal scared people that believe the crap they're told. Basically your reform voters but different circumstances. And there's real ugly breeds of Nazis that probably don't mind calling themselves Nazi in public.
And yes, it is Merkel's (and the cdus) fault.Edit to say that the Merkel years did way more damage than just making people believe they are overrun by Syrians.
It's a bit what the Tory's managed to do to the UK (fucked public service, trains, police, schools and so on) but more stable, as only one figurehead. -
• #89937
Don't forget Kohl. It was mainly he who screwed the East so badly that his corrupt and toxic legacy still isn't overcome. Schröder and Merkel were poor chancellors, too, but the main responsibility lies with Kohl.
-
• #89938
Oh definitely. It's like the bad parts of GDR society survived and at the same time it all got fucked by capitalism.
But there would have been the chance to do better after Kohl. -
• #89939
Ah a lot of the headlines I read weren't clear..
But still Italy and many others are turning to the right.
-
• #89940
Sure, but Schröder was just a continuity conservative like Blair; pretending to be an SPD chancellor while doing very little until the CDU got in again (albeit mostly in Grand Coalitions). Hence the steady drift of German politics towards immoderation (similar, of course, to other countries like Britain and France). Merkel, unimaginative and managerial, only really did two things that broke the mould--the exit from nuclear power (I assume that she, as a physicist, was one of very few politicians who would have had a proper understanding of the issues) and the opening of the border to (mainly) Syrians after the Syrian catastrophe. I assume the latter was mainly determined by demographic considerations, although she has given other reasons. It's also a cornerstone of attempts to blame immigration for so many evils rather than attacking the actual perpetrators of the injustices of the last forty years.
-
• #89941
I think the exit from nuclear power was as a reaction to Fukushima and to take a topic away from the Greens, she also destroyed the German solar industry and made the country dependent on russian gas and coal power.
-
• #89942
Might be time to hold a referendum and give the eastern states a chance to separate. I’m sure things will improve for them, if they’re given another go at the good old days.
-
• #89943
I think the exit from nuclear power was as a reaction to Fukushima
That was the opportunity she took, yes. I'm still willing to credit her with the understanding that I mentioned.
and to take a topic away from the Greens, she also destroyed the German solar industry and made the country dependent on russian gas and coal power.
Yes, the subsidies on installing solar panels were just too successful. While Merkel, unimaginatively, didn't change direction on Russian gas, it was largely a set of policies she inherited. I also think they were still supported by her coalition partners.
-
• #89944
You jest, but the power behind the AfD is indeed Putin. Masquerading as 'patriots', they are there to destabilise Germany. The party was a bit like UKIP at first and, like UKIP, was taken over by Putin-linked figures. The process is unlike FPTP systems, where it's enough to parachute in an idiot like Trump or Johnson and a couple of other candidates for Parliamentary or Congressional seats. In countries with proportional representation, they're attempting to make it work through claiming to be democratic parties. The ultimate aim will be to align Germany with Putin and in the process try to do this with Eastern European states, too. So, yes, there's definitely an attempt here to reverse history, although not in the direction of the old pretences of 'systems', and this time for all of Germany. I don't think they'll get there, but it's worrying and there will be a lot of pain in the process.
-
• #89945
Only part of me was jesting…
Good post.
-
• #89946
Don't forget unlimited gak.
-
• #89947
Merkel, unimaginative and managerial, only really did two things that broke the mould--the exit from nuclear power (I assume that she, as a physicist, was one of very few politicians who would have had a proper understanding of the issues)
Yes, and she proved that she, like all politicians, are more than capable of going against what they know if it is politically advantageous.
-
• #89948
Er? Have you already been Frenchified into a nuclear power supporter? Or at least that's the only way I can make sense of your post.
-
• #89949
But still buying french nuclear generated power.
-
• #89950
unlimited gak.
First thing I thought. Scaffolders, roofers, joiners. Mad for the chisel...
I'm confused.
It was a brief post. They outlined the positives to be gained and characterised the counter argument as whinging and that smokers will get over it.