In the news

Posted on
Page
of 3,693
First Prev
/ 3,693
Last Next
  • Probably, all kinds of weird shit used as an excuse for the housing crisis hoorah brigade , can't stand those programmes, the last one I saw was a mewp diesel platform converted to a folly, having worked with those on site they are very polluting. However if you have the time and money. A functional canal would've made more sense, I mean why not just swim in that? The guy must be a toker but it's kinda cool still, I know someone whole lives on a boat in a dry dock. I have thought about that kind of set up or a railway carriage similarly shipping container , prefer a geodome and log clunch flint and reed thatch hovel though still.

  • 5 bodies found on the yacht, 1 still missing.
    Among them, Lynch and his daughter, his defence lawyer and his wife, his defence witness and his wife.

  • Who’s missing?

  • Maybe the last crew member? I was hoping it could be bill gates or Elon musk 🤔😞

  • One of those 6, I don’t think the Italian authorities have confirmed the last missing person. Doesn’t look optimistic for the last person to be found though.

    I mean it’s all still a coincidence, but after a very public and rare acquittal, both defendants, their lawyer and defence witness have deadly accidents.

  • It proves that the CIA controls the weather. The chemtrails, the birds, it all adds up.

  • Half a per cent of our brain weight can be plastic.

    Holy fuck 🤯

  • Maybe that's the part the cia controls

  • The plastic part I mean

  • I know a few people for whom a head full of plastic would be an improvement.

  • Smooths out the bumps

  • You'd have thought they could have paid someone to do a better job than that.
    Maybe they were high....

  • BBC reporting that the super yacht was actually moving when the storm came in. Earlier reports seemed to suggest it was at anchor.


    1 Attachment

  • It proves that the CIA controls the weather

    If you're going to sink an 'unsinkable boat' (the manufacturer said that, titanic etc), then surely the best time is in bad weather to make it look like an accident?

    Just to reiterate, I'm not in the conspiracy camp, im sure it was an accident, just a thought.

  • So the officials were undercover pretending to be fruit in some kind of sting?

  • Couldn't that just be the anchor dragging / chain breaking in extreme conditions?

  • The bloke on the nearest boat who went to help said the Bayesian was 'moving fast'. Must have been the anchor dragging/chain breaking.

    The divers are apparently saying there was a hatch open, but this hasn't been confirmed. They've not said whether the mast was broken. Presumably they can't see it and they can't go and look because they need to concentrate on the hull. They've also said the hull is 'intact'. So if there's no hole in the hull the water must have got in some other way, i.e. hatches or maybe broken windows/portholes. But it's so dark down there I doubt anyone will know much more until they raise the wreck.

    The skipper has been interviewed by investigators. They've asked him about the keel, which apparently was partially down. Nobody seems to know whether it could or should have been fully down.

    Some of the experts are saying that given the forecast of stormy weather the crew should have told the guests to stay awake and wear life jackets.

    Then there's the question of why the survival rate of the crew was so much higher than the guests. Maybe the crew were much quicker to leave their cabins when the boat was first thrown around? They would have known that it was their job to get on deck asap. But the guests might have waited, wondering what to do, waiting for instructions. And guests in large cabins with double beds could have been thrown some distance when the boat was knocked down, unlike crew in compact berths.

  • I would imagine that the crew has had to react to a crisis in the past that didn't involve a small wobble on the Stock Market. They are also more likely to be relatively fit and decent swimmers. There's a strong chance that they've relied on themselves to survive, not paid someone else to do it for them.

  • Probably a submarine pulled it down and the hit and run was an mk ultra hit job.not

  • They are also more likely to be relatively fit

    And if not, they’re at least less likely to be intoxicated to the point of serious impairment. It was a party to celebrate a billionaire not going to prison, it’s almost certain that the guests were sloshed.

    Also, most of the crew could tell that something was going seriously wrong, and could probably find the way out of the ship in a panic. The guests and rarely present owners would’ve relied entirely on the crew.

  • I wonder if they have a permanent rotating watch on ships like this?

  • Vada a bordo, cazzo!

  • That would be usual. (I worked on one.) It's usually 4 hours on, 4 hours off when at sea. They do safety checks 24 hrs a day, inspecting doors, hatches etc. They'd also have emergency drills with survival suits and liferafts etc. And they don't drink. Anything weird happens and they rush to the deck with their life jackets, whether on duty or not.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

In the news

Posted by Avatar for Platini @Platini

Actions