-
• #1677
Since it has been identified as an issue, why not fix it before the Euros? Makes more sense no?
-
• #1678
Can we have a diagram for that 90 degree rule? I think those who actually know what the rule is and how to police it are fewer than the number of people who know the rules on penalties.
-
• #1679
Isn't there a catch all "refs calls dangerous play" rule? So if a ref wants to call elbows they can?
-
• #1680
Nope. Hopefully the elbows thing won't be a big deal.
Can we have a diagram for that 90 degree rule?
The t-bone?
-
• #1681
Emyr means the 90s degrees on the arm thing.
The rules say pushing with the arm is allowed, as long as the elbow isn't extended more than 90 degrees.
The reasoning for the rule is so you can defend with your arm, but not strongarm someone.
Which in itself I don't think is a bad thing
-
• #1682
Any clarification on the "initiated the contact" rule?
-
• #1683
as long as the elbow isn't extended more than 90 degrees.
This part needs a diagram. My elbow is typically at 100 - 180 degrees extended when riding my bike.
-
• #1684
Mallet arm, not riding arm.
It means you can raise your mallet arm up (when bent) to receive/give checks... you'll see people nearly always then extend their arm and push people away (with their palm and wrist) after receiving a check by this method, this is what the rule tries to disallow, nobody calls it (in my experience).
Shoulder-to-shoulder is the ideal kind of contact, but some people are slight/gangly and prefer using a curled/bent arm for contact.
-
• #1685
-
• #1686
So you mean the hand may not extend further from the centreline than the elbow?
Good diagram.
-
• #1687
Centreline?
no, as in the angle made at the elbow can't be more than 90 degree, when initiating contact with the arm.
-
• #1688
Time to practice a one inch punch? (Or one inch elbow)
-
• #1689
photoshop skillz: off the chartz
-
• #1690
photoshop skillz: off the chartz
???
I thought that was a photo! -
• #1691
ha
-
• #1692
I called this a few times at the UK Champs. I felt mean at the time but they were blatant pushes!
-
• #1693
But this is Badger's entire game!
-
• #1695
Rules questions from last nights pickup:
1) Moving a dropped mallet:
Doesn't really help answer the scenario, as it implies intention from the player to move it further on purpose, not just to get it out of his way.
2) Off the ball checking
There is no rule against it.
.
-
• #1696
Do you want me to move my post here?
-
• #1697
No, I just thought it should be here too.
-
• #1698
You should move your own posts John - you move everyone elses...
(beagle winky)
-
• #1699
Off the ball checking was discussed in Geneva: if you ask some old timers they reckon it's never been cool... you're only meant to check the ball carrier.
Now we're at the point where you need to be able to check blocking players (in my opinion) and many young guns have perhaps never felt that a check off the ball was a dick move.
It's never been ruled about, so yeah: checks off the ball are cool (I guess)?
In other news: T-boning has never been a rule either (but is now covered under initiating bike-on-bike contact).
-
• #1700
I don't think it's a new verses old thing, Vidal checked me off the ball the first time I was in a game with him.
(Not a complaint, it was one of my favourite games of polo ever, it was like an epiphany!)
Interesting discussion on LOBP.
Turns out elbows were missed out of the ruleset. All it says is your arm can't be extended more than 90 degrees at the elbow.
It's going to get fixed in the next version, but until then, elbows are technically legal. Depends how much of a dick you are obviously, but also be aware others at the Euros might use it...