-
• #727
She's retiring this year and needs the money.
TBF some may say Vicky retired last year.
-
• #728
You dont see Kelly Holmes in pin up pictures.
Thank fuck.
-
• #729
I reckon it must truly suck to be an elite.
Seriously.the position they get put in, the way they become an automaton of what they do, good fucking luck to you Vicky, whatever you want to do after this season.
I hope you enjoy life cos the way they spit you out after you're best is done is just another aspect of how stupid it is. -
• #730
I reckon it must truly suck to be an elite.
Seriously.the position they get put in, the way they become an automaton of what they do, good fucking luck to you Vicky, whatever you want to do after this season.
I hope you enjoy life cos the way they spit you out after you're best is done is just another aspect of how stupid it is.This. rep +1. Well said indeed.
-
• #731
Want this thread deleted.
-
• #732
I find your objection bizarre.
She is a an awe inspiring athlete, who is also a beautiful woman...
Why should she not enjoy the spotlight?
Why should we not admire her?
-
• #733
First and foremost she's a bloody fantastic cyclist. Who just so happens to be a good looker, nothing wrong with that.
When I'm watching her and other cyclists race believe it or not but their looks ain't the first thing on my mind.
-
• #734
I reckon it must truly suck to be an elite.
Seriously.the position they get put in, the way they become an automaton of what they do, good fucking luck to you Vicky, whatever you want to do after this season.
I hope you enjoy life cos the way they spit you out after you're best is done is just another aspect of how stupid it is.Agree with this. Was thinking the same recently actually watching old Olympics footage wondering what they're up to now.
-
• #735
she is seriously hot
that is all
-
• #736
I can't understand why any of you lot give a fuck and feel you need to either approve or disapprove. She's a fully grown woman and has done as much with her life as any of you have with yours. It's patronising and prudish. This is a great woman who has the respect of everyone here, why are we debating her personal decisions?
-
• #737
Because she's earned the right for her decisions pertaining to self promotion, context and public image to be debated. And because she's decided (rightly or wrongly) that a major part of her self presentation should be done in her undercrackers, which has political and social implications - like it or not.
Like Beckham's tatts, Rooney's hair or Hoy's taxation choices, public profile = debate and if you draw attention to yourself for being all fit and beddable then you should logically be prepared for your assets and the manner of exposure to be debated.
I think she's more interesting on the bike for now fwiw. But the choice is hers.
-
• #738
if you draw attention to yourself for being all fit and beddable then you should logically be prepared for your assets and the manner of exposure to be debated.
The lovely Dame Kelly hasn't done lurid photo shoots and yet she's attracted adverse comment.
-
• #739
So that's a different debate then.
-
• #740
Oh I give up.
-
• #741
Give up on what? Censoring the debate?
-
• #742
You're a sensor!
-
• #743
She's hardly "censoring" the debate just by taking part in it. Generally a debate involves people with multiple different opinions, and accusing somebody with different opinions to yours of "censorship" is a dodgy argument any way you look at it
-
• #744
Want this thread deleted.
I refer to this obviously. Not an attack or any type of problem with Nick Nack's objections. In fact I'd have thought that the tone of my 1st post (above) makes it fairly obvious that I'm up for a conversation about it and not particularly interested in VP's sex appeal.
-
• #745
Infact Bothwell, had you actually read any of the last pages posts before deciding to give me a lecture on the meaning of censorship? Bit patronising that.
-
• #746
She didn't actually censor anything, though, did she? Indicated that she'd like to see it censored, but she hasn't shut anything down.
My note is probably one of pedantry, rather than condescension, tbh.
-
• #747
I refer to this obviously. Not an attack or any type of problem with Nick Nack's objections. In fact I'd have thought that the tone of my 1st post (above) makes it fairly obvious that I'm up for a conversation about it and not particularly interested in VP's sex appeal.
Yes, it was not at you. I was just stating my mood.
Thankyou for you post. You put it better than I. -
• #748
Cheers Nick-Nack.
-
• #749
I have stated my objections to this. Being a female myself I find it offensive.
I am not arguing that some may find her attractive, just the part of her letting her side down.
I like the naked photo of her on her bike. That says, 'I am pro women athletes, it says look at me i am feminine and strong and i'd kick your arse '.The underwear ones say ' im desperate.'
My opinion.
-
• #750
Agreed.
lol.