-
• #302
Although if I were you I'd have either,
i) Asked for a written proof
ii) Rewritten my conjecture that you can't beat 9, to include the caveat, "Using only the arabic number system..." -
• #303
It's all about 7...
I believe you'll find that it's all about 17
-
• #304
3 is the number of cosmic awesomeness man
Factoid.
-
• #305
sorry forgot that apostrophe, that would have truly indicated the pisstake ;-)
-
• #306
Dear OPer.
All the active members are thinking, but not saying,that the ideal number of bikes is for most of us n+1, where n=the number of bikes you currently have. Some of us then get to the watershed of n-1. That's when you have admitted you have a problem, or not enough room, or an angry co-habitee, or a combination thereof. Or just realised you have more than you need.
-
• #307
correct^ currently n+1=8
-
• #308
I am experiencing N-1 at the moment, not a happy place to be - i generally like to be hovering around N +2/3
-
• #309
Factoid.
No Polo. No understanding. -
• #310
n+1 can turn into a sickness. It can result in the purchasing of things like recumbents and tandems. be careful.
(anyone have a recumbent they want to sell?)
-
• #311
No Polo. No understanding.
^ Sticker
-
• #312
I want a recumbent. Preferably this: http://www.kinetics-online.co.uk/html/scorpion.shtml
-
• #313
n+1 can turn into a sickness. It can result in the purchasing of things like recumbents and tandems. be careful.
(anyone have a recumbent they want to sell?)
Too late, i got this the other day
-
• #314
^ sweet
-
• #315
I want a recumbent. Preferably this: http://www.kinetics-online.co.uk/html/scorpion.shtml
looks like fun, and I prefer (although never tried either) the under hand steering (rather than the chest height style), but I think I'd rather have a two-wheeler.
-
• #316
23 is the correct FNORD number of bikes.
-
• #317
I want a recumbent. Preferably this: http://www.kinetics-online.co.uk/html/scorpion.shtml
Like a HHSB version of those kids trikes they hire out in Battersea Park - that looks a great machine to go for very, very long ride on , like over to Easts Drinks!
-
• #318
Used to have very similar work one, KMX make them wierdly enough on Hayling island, U.K
http://www.kmxkarts.co.uk/
they go fast on the smooth, awful on the uphill though,
you get massive attention from everyone though, not that that would interest anyone on here of course.... -
• #319
I believe you'll find that it's all about 17
I prefer 19... Very fond of 47 too... Bit meh about 17...
-
• #320
Used to have very similar work one, KMX make them wierdly enough on Hayling island, U.K
http://www.kmxkarts.co.uk/
they go fast on the smooth, awful on the uphill though,
you get massive attention from everyone though, not that that would interest anyone on here of course....^ douche bag reading the paper while riding on that link!
-
• #321
I want a recumbent. Preferably this: http://www.kinetics-online.co.uk/html/scorpion.shtml
dude these are so much fun! i used to borrow one regularly bacn in my early pedicabbing days. they're fsking quick and insanely manouverable.
-
• #322
I prefer 19... Very fond of 47 too... Bit meh about 17...
yeah we all prefer 19..
-
• #323
skate a little lower now........
YouTube- Steely Dan - Hey Nineteen (with lyrics)
-
• #324
"Can anyone beat 9?"
no one can ever, ever beat 9,
heres how, multiply 9 x any number, it reduces to 9,
watch,
9 x 9 =81, 8 +1 =9
9 x 723= 2943, 2+9 =11+4=15+3=18 1+8= 99 is the number of cosmic awesomeness man
9 x 0 = 0 ?
-
• #325
23 is the correct FNORD number of bikes.
And if you belive that, you'll believe anything!
ha! yeah 7 is good actually, more cosmic than 9'spower, Crowley et al go mad on that shit