Epic fail

Big fan of refrigerant and Ferraris, nothing to see here.

Surely even in a Ferrari 2nd comes beneath 1st, 4th beneath 3rd etc..

A quick image search confirms this is the case.

Whoosh

R123 - a gas used in refrigeration
456 - a model of Cararri

Lol

Is Carrari a small artisan Italian sports car manufacturer?

Fucking petrolheads.

Sounds like an 80s bike with a made-up "Italian" name.

loooool

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/06/my-encounter-with-the-self-righteous-cry-bullies-of-cambridge

Even by Spectator standards, that ^ is toe curlingly awful.

Jesus fucking Christ. His shit rape jokes don't land and he moans about it in an actual article, what a fuckhead.

the spectator. the #1 choice for edgelords who 'benefited' from a private education.

it's the Top Gear of print news media: by cunts, for cunts.

James Delingpole

What more do you need to know? A walking, talking chemical toilet of a man.

He's so fucking hateful.

I was close friends with his younger sister in my teenage years. I just knew she had an Oxbridge author as an older brother. I had no idea he was engaged in sticking his cock in a pig's heads with the future prime minister and destroyer of Worlds.

That is hilarious.

How odd.

Even if you sympathised with some of his sentiments about "things getting too PC", surely you'd still read that as 'no one found my jokes funny and now I'm throwing my toys out of the pram'. He is literally a snowflake.

Also love the way he references civility after trying to do a Frankie Boyle routine.

Shame you now have to subscribe to read the comments. Spectator comments were always my favourite.

JFC. It does make you wonder what the chaps that rallied round him must be like.

Imaginary or total whoppers.

Fucking bellend, it's not even about too PC, the "joke" is that educated people don't commit rape, only thick poor people, so information on consent isn't needed at Cambridge. Despite it almost certainly being introduced because some cunts there will have been raping and sexually assaulting people between bouts of burning money, kicking tramps and fucking pig heads or whatever they do when politicians in training.

I think that at least one study has found a link between social status and likelihood to commit a sex crime.

The Swedish government were looking to prove or disprove that there is no link between religion and sex crime and stumbled across the fact that the only indicator of increased likelihood of committing a sex crime, was social status.

I.e a working class Swede was as likely to commit a sex crime as a working class mmigrant.

Of course, even if this is true, it doesn't even begin to justify his comments.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was the other way, but no matter what, there will have been actual cases, possibly affecting people in the room. Instead of thinking about what he's said and why it would cause people to react in such a way, he's decided it's because people are too politically correct and he's somehow the victim of that, and then gone further and written that shite down in what is meant to be at least a vaguely proper publication. What a gross person.