Current Projects chat and miscellany

Posted on
Page
of 5,312
First Prev
/ 5,312
Last Next
  • Is that 24" front and rear? Looks interesting !

  • yeh was gonna say! bridges are way backwards!
    interesting!

  • Is that 24" front and rear? Looks interesting !

    rear only i supposed. if i couldn't find the best option, i think i need to sell it.

    yeh was gonna say! bridges are way backwards!
    interesting!

    nice observation mate. what should be great for this size?

  • I don't see why it would have a smaller wheel at the back ?

  • this page is truly interesting! awesome!

  • More to the point, why a small back wheel with normal length stays? Defeats the usual object of getting your team mates as close behind as possible in a team pursuit.

  • ^ perhaps if you had stays to suit a 24" wheel you'd have to have a very long seatpost which would be too flexy. I dunno.

  • hopefully nicely done on the end of this year.. 24" back =(

    That's mental, want!

  • The gaps are gonna be ridiculous. You could get 5 sets of mudguards in there

  • And backpacks all fitted like Scott's, that's HHSB over 9000. square. miles.

  • I don't see why it would have a smaller wheel at the back ?

    for getting your team mates as close behind as possible in a team pursuit.

    Nice place to put your frame pump.

    Just sayin.

  • Hahaha awesome

  • ^ perhaps if you had stays to suit a 24" wheel you'd have to have a very long seatpost

    It's only the chain stays which could be substantially shorter


    1 Attachment

    • 5df1_3.JPG
  • what would you say the actual riding differences be between 700c ride and this one^

  • If your contact points triangle is unchanged and the steering geometry is properly sorted, small wheels make very little difference to the feel of a road/track bike. Tony Doyle reported that he could throw his pursuit bike around just like a 6-day bike

  • It's only the chain stays which could be substantially shorter

    Ah yes, my stupidity strikes again. Crazy looking bike, that.

  • ^^ but the smaller wheels are of course more agile / accelerate faster - because they're lighter? btw, any idea where would one get some clinchers / inner tubes for those 24" 520mm suckers these days? =))

  • any idea where would one get some clinchers / inner tubes for those 24" 520mm suckers these days? =))

    There is a 23-520 Schwalbe Durano, use with Schwalbe inner tube 9C

    Velocity Fusion or Aerohead rims come in the 520 size.

  • Haha. Pfiko read my mind, and I was trying to be subtle.

  • cheers MT =))

  • ^^ but the smaller wheels are of course more agile / accelerate faster - because they're lighter? btw, any idea where would one get some clinchers / inner tubes for those 24" 520mm suckers these days? =))

    http://www.airnimal.eu/Reference/FAQJoey.php

    I've got a pair of 36 hole rims, but I doubt you'll be using that spoke count.

  • why is that?

  • chrobin, this is still extremely great work, but have you tested it yet??
    other than around your flat

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Current Projects chat and miscellany

Posted by Avatar for emoxfag @emoxfag

Actions