-
• #2427
I am contemplating getting a Contax T3. I'd like a nice slim pocketable camera I can carry around with me that has a good lens, anyone had any experience with them? Also looking at the Ricoh GR1...
Never tried the Contax but I'd like to point out that there are quite a few nice cameras in the Ricoh range that are seriously more affordable than the GR series.
I have an R10 and a modded R1 that are my most used cameras now.
-
• #2428
Is there a film camera that's known for being water resistant? Sounds like an idiotic question but I only had my XA this weekend and didn't use it more than twice because of the rain, pissed me off.
-
• #2429
Is there a film camera that's known for being water resistant? Sounds like an idiotic question but I only had my XA this weekend and didn't use it more than twice because of the rain, pissed me off.
-
• #2430
Olympus MJU II
Bomb proof and weather sealed. I usually put mine in a jersey pocket when I'm out cycling.
It's not waterproof but unless you go underwater with it it'll hold up fine. I've used mine in tropic climates and It's been great.
-
• #2431
Supersonic-zlad what film and camera? Just posting a picture doesn't show us what you used...........
Hey. Yeah, sorry about that, completely forgot. Hasselblad 500CM with Portra 400VC. Was surprised by the relatively muted colours, but quite like the effect.
-
• #2432
XA2, expired fuji 800.
XA love fest. Double-X in Diafine. 400-800 asa.
Nice work! Like these two in particular.
-
• #2433
Olympus MJU II
Bomb proof and weather sealed. I usually put mine in a jersey pocket when I'm out cycling.
It's not waterproof but unless you go underwater with it it'll hold up fine. I've used mine in tropic climates and It's been great.
I've got a mju 2 but the reaaallly slow lens annoys me, esp when shooting candid stuff! But yeah I should dig it out.
-
• #2434
I've got a mju 2 but the reaaallly slow lens annoys me, esp when shooting candid stuff! But yeah I should dig it out.
Have you got the zoom version because that's pants compared to the standard edition one.
-
• #2435
ah yes I do. Now I see the problem! Merci.
-
• #2436
Few shots from my 4th roll of film. XA2 with fuji 200 slide film. There are some better shots on the roll I think, but the scans were awful, hopefully gonna rescan them soon... Andy?
-
• #2437
Where do you process your film nefarious, you get really lush tones.
-
• #2438
A load of places for c41 includings jessops and other cheapo 1hr places but mainly digitalab as they do B&W, e6 and c41. I also then scan the negs myself.
-
• #2439
have you ever gotten scans from digitalab?
-
• #2440
They have either a Hasselblad or Imacon flextight scanner that I saw at a tour of digitalab so I imagine the scans would be pretty good, although I haven't actually had any done by them. What kind of scanner do you use nefarious?
-
• #2441
.....
-
• #2442
have you ever gotten scans from digitalab?
Nope. Always seemed expensive - I know they've recently changed their prices though. Also not much point paying when I've got access to a really nice slide scanner.
-
• #2443
They have either a Hasselblad or Imacon flextight scanner that I saw at a tour of digitalab so I imagine the scans would be pretty good, although I haven't actually had any done by them. What kind of scanner do you use nefarious?
I use a Nikon coolscan 9000 that they've got in my studio. For 35mm film they just use a Coolscan IV last time I checked, it's the reason I never bothered getting scans from them.
-
• #2444
Coolscan IV no good?
-
• #2445
or just similar to coolscan 9000?
-
• #2446
good but not as good as the 9000
-
• #2447
Coolscan IV no good?
Yeah, they're alright but not as good as the 9000. I started scanning on an IV but when they got a 9000 into the studio I ended up rescanning everything I'd done on the IV as the 9000's scans were so much better.
-
• #2448
hm... been pondering an IV for home use as it seems to be somewhat normally priced on the bay, then again, a fiver for scan to cd when you dev is allright too, at least for lomo stuff
-
• #2449
Well I got some done at digitalab and they seem a bit shit to me. Dunno if it's the scans or if they did something to the images after, but they look like someone got a bit carried away with the sharpen tool in photoshop. Just wanting them rescanned to see what the difference is. Also the colours on the slides look quite different to the scans, maybe that's just what happens
-
• #2450
can anyone recommend a good uk photography forum? Preferably for analogue stuff but if it caters for all i don't mind dipping my toes in both ponds
I am contemplating getting a Contax T3. I'd like a nice slim pocketable camera I can carry around with me that has a good lens, anyone had any experience with them? Also looking at the Ricoh GR1...