Analog film photography and cameras

Posted on
Page
of 968
  • They are quite sharp though indeed
    : ]

  • Turns out the 15 year old Porta UC I found in a shoebox at home might have benefitted from not being stored in a shoebox for 15 years. Even overexposing it a stop didn't help. Will post results once I've rescued it a bit in post...

  • If anyone's looking to get some E6 processing done, I've just used John Salim (not seen him mentioned on here before) and can thoroughly recommend. £4.70 a roll aint bad.

  • So many glowing horizons, smh. But for £6 dev and scan I don't really care. It's only blog fodder after all!

  • I sent filmdev a roll saying give me the highest possible resolution scans, they are 150mb+ TIFs and all great! No idea which scanner they used.

  • ..check EXIF data?

  • not much ..


    1 Attachment

    • Screen Shot 2018-10-26 at 13.06.31.png
  • Is there any point in having a 150mb tif for a 30mp image? And if it's 35mm is there actually that amount of detail in the grain? I was told that the finest grain 35mm film is about 20-25mp at best.

  • 6x7, i have no idea tbh

  • In that case I'd be after more resolution, personally!

  • 150Mb, should be an Imacon ?

  • But the output resolution would be higher, 6x7 @ 3200dpi comes out at 7500x8800~

  • Thanks for all the advice in terms of not getting the most out of my medium format camera. Found this in a drawer and been out shooting on my lunch break, I can feel the addiction slowly coming back...


    1 Attachment

    • xd7.jpg
  • 50mm 1.2! NAWTY.

  • .

  • Ye I got a really blurry pic back in my latest roll that I took after a fair few pints, which I also strangely don't totally hate. Show us yours then ?


    1 Attachment

    • 41110004.JPG
  • Usually, anything but perfectly in focus and sharp pisses me off, but somehow in my last batch I've got a pair of completely blurry photos I quite like!


    2 Attachments

    • R1-09455-0014.jpg
    • R5-09459-0016.jpg
  • That bottom one is great

  • Santander. HP5.


    1 Attachment

    • 10F516F2-E0BB-4CDE-9FC4-0A490B07B6D5.jpeg
  • Yes yes yes indeed.

  • Also, you can add "totally weird as fuck redeye correction" to the list of things filmdev do :-/

    That's terrible. I guess they stick the machine on auto and crank them out with minimal intervention, hence the low price for C41.
    I won't be using them again, their over sharpening makes things like Ektar grainy.

  • Found this in a drawer and been out shooting on my lunch break, I can feel the addiction slowly coming back...

    Nice thing to have hidden in the back of a drawer !

  • Nice pic but what's the combo film/dev/scan ? So much grain but look like it's not the original grain.

  • SO MUCH GRAIN. It's pretty bonkers really. And what's annoying about the redeye thing is that undoing the automatic mess is a pain, but just clicking with the PS redeye tool is a piece of piss and works much better (99% of the time anyway).

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Analog film photography and cameras

Posted by Avatar for GA2G @GA2G

Actions