-
• #25852
?
Not much wrong with that. Probably black it out completely but keep the sidewalls
-
• #25853
Pointless in isolation, you must build a set of four to properly exploit the design.
-
• #25854
^^ never said there was anything wrong with it....
-
• #25855
Pointless in isolation, you must build a set of four to properly exploit the design.
exactly the plan
-
• #25856
This might do it.
-
• #25857
No, it is a weight weenie built by an cretin.
has chainbreaker finished his bike?
-
• #25858
-
• #25859
oh wow!
-
• #25860
I really like the Superb frames, but that looks terrible in such a tiny size.
-
• #25861
Sizist.
(So true)
-
• #25862
I don't think the size is the issue there.
-
• #25863
should make a low pro version with a 650c so the top tube still slopes slightly, or maybe that's a terrible idea
-
• #25864
this just popped up on my FB page from Morvelo???!!!!
-
• #25865
TT might be level if it wasn't for the fork with ridiculous axle-crown...
Or is that a 650 wheel in a 700 fork? it's making my head hurt....
-
• #25866
looks like 650 wheel 700 fork. I'd just go custom twin 650 if I needed a frame of that size.
dodici gara or orlowski aint that expensive, I think you could get either of those for the price of a superb sprint.balanced small 48x48 bike:
not anti in any way! -
• #25867
Not small either.
-
• #25868
650c bikes are just awesome, wouldn't mind one my self for when i take the train places or have to carry my bike through places....
-
• #25869
All the gear ect
-
• #25870
That is fucking horrendous
-
• #25871
-
• #25872
functional bikes
-
• #25873
that stem...
-
• #25874
-
• #25875
Change the tyres, lose the stupid saddle and I reckon it could be nice.
I'm pretty sure it wasn't