-
• #25552
Haha, didn't want to bash him over there! ;)
-
• #25553
That bike has been posted many times. Many, many times. Many, many, many times.
I seen him ride too, he look like he's a five years old struggling to ride his dad's 23" road bicycle with toe barely touching the strap.
-
• #25554
Pretty sure that's a repost
-
• #25555
-
• #25556
Pretty sure that's a repost
from 2 years ago, yes
-
• #25557
Yes it's ugly, but it floats over trail irregularities.
-
• #25559
Chop n' drop?
-
• #25560
-
• #25561
^^^ I think a 4.5kg bike deserves more respect..
then again...
-
• #25562
^^^ I think a 4.5kg bike deserves more respect..
It's not the most aesthetically offensive weight weenie build I've ever seen.
Is that nuf respeck?
-
• #25563
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/08/a-concept-bike-designed-for-running/261706/
bleurgh. and then click on the video and check out how much the deathtrap flexes!
-
• #25564
Can you imagine how horrific being involved in a crash with that would be?
-
• #25565
a lot of weight and impact going straight to skull. it looks hilarious, if you survive it.
-
• #25566
We covered that adequately when it was launched, if The Atlantic is a year behind the rest of us that's no reason to drag it up again.
-
• #25567
a lot of weight and impact going straight to skull. it looks hilarious, if you survive it.
They said that about the High Ordinary, back in 1879!
-
• #25568
Ohh, thats why you dont see these on the road?
-
• #25569
Na, they're all pootling about out of sight on country roads :)
-
• #25571
-
• #25572
With all the shit bikes out there, this thread surely doesn't need another repost?
-
• #25573
-
• #25574
Check out the chevrons on the frame, those are for you.
-
• #25575
it's a time trial frame, not a track frame
Agustin I see what you did here