-
• #21977
Monark frame up there is the same paintjob as my vw camper. Also considered anti on vw forums :)
-
• #21978
and still saddle to bar drop (marginal, but looking at hoods position as well...) - thought the idea with those "things" was to have bar to saddle drop?
depending really, I find the latter way too high, and make hill climbing hard work with too much weight on the rear right now the position felt a bit more idea, more weight on the front, and I intend to have a good amount of weight on the front.
I find the bike easier to control on the ascend than a loaded rear pannier (which I discovered doing the Ditchling that the front wheel kept lifting from the tarmac at every pedals stroke no matter how far foward I put myself).
I had that bike for quite a while, and been upgrading for quite a while with the necessary change (wheelset especially)
originally as I got it;
-
• #21979
-
• #21980
sorry if repost -
• #21981
whoevers done that should get hang by the balls!
-
• #21982
:(
-
• #21983
Moser and Rossin make me a sad panda ):
-
• #21984
It's ok, it's being rescued over in the lopro thread.
:)
-
• #21985
-
• #21986
Fuck me... I bought that wheelset from a mate of the guy that owned this bike a few years back.... Don't have either anymore (the rear was stolen when they took my steamroller and the spok was sold last year)... Totally forgot that this is what the used to sit on.. Did you post this from an old sales thread??? Classic that it ended up in Anti!
-
• #21987
moser is best melting bike ever!
-
• #21988
Uploaded with ImageShack.usnot so bad.
-
• #21989
moser is best melting bike ever!
Great descrip haha
-
• #21990
I respect Thorn. But they need to sort the headtube of that Sherpa out. Its strupid. I've never seen one without a spacer stack.
-
• #21991
The Moser is an ugly frame imo. It looked good when it had the huge wheel at the back but it looks shit on those frames.
-
• #21992
The Moser is an ugly frame imo. It looked good when it had the huge wheel at the back but it looks shit on those frames.
Reminds me of that stick figure GIF. With the stick man flicking his cock forward, and arching his back in an extreme manner.
My heads friday fucked though.
-
• #21993
...the stick man flicking his cock forward, and arching his back...
Jeysus wept. I think I just got a glimpse into the recesses of the Smallfurry mind.
shiverrrrr
-
• #21994
This has to be one of the ugliest builds I've seen in a while. Straight bars, really? This probably all weighs in at over 9 kg so whoever rides this must either be getting tired real quick or must have legs of steel.
-
• #21995
is over 9kg heavy then!??!!
-
• #21996
My super trick T3 is going to be nearly 8kg :-(
-
• #21997
I respect Thorn. But they need to sort the headtube of that Sherpa out. Its strupid. I've never seen one without a spacer stack.
To be fair, I needed a smaller frame to get just about the right reach (60cm stem), so my case is more of an abnormal one.
I think it's fine as it allowed a lots more flexibility than having a longer head tube, especially if there are individual whom have shorter legs for example, here's some well put together one;
-
• #21998
My super trick T3 is going to be nearly 8kg :-(
Is that a problem? I guess you'll be testing on it, and it looks like it'll be epicly (<is now a word) aero!
5 bottle cages! Needs a "Fuck Thirst" sticker
-
• #21999
Is that a problem?
Of course not, any more than it's problem that most World Championship class sprint bikes are in the same area, despite the UCI allowing them to be 2lb lighter.
-
• #22000
This probably all weighs in at over 9 kg so whoever rides this must either be getting tired real quick or must have legs of steel.
Because you need legs of steel to ride a <9kg bike for more than a very short time? I guess my legs must be adamantium then.
and still saddle to bar drop (marginal, but looking at hoods position as well...) - thought the idea with those "things" was to have bar to saddle drop?