-
• #3727
Chick in the background with the testicles in the jar is a bit harsh, no?
Agree
-
• #3729
I will sell you a watch. It can be a constant remainder of the passage of time and the need to fight it.
Your pitch has already been ripped off by the cuntards at Crispin Porter + Bogusky for Diesel. You can tell they stole it from you because Lance Armstrong X Oprah is mentioned in the article.
-
• #3730
Chick in the background with the testicles in the jar is a bit harsh, no?
On that note I think it is worth mentioning that the loss of a single testicle tends to have absolutely minimal (if any) hormonal implications to the body.
LA would be a proper twat to try to use his orchidectomy as a partial explanation.
-
• #3731
repped for use of orchidectomy.
-
• #3732
This thread is hilarious, best in ages. Thanks everyone, I haven't laughed so hard at this forum EVER.
-
• #3733
I can see it now.
"The whole peloton were taking HRG and testosterone and I was already at a disadvantage after losing one of my testicles to cancer. Would I have doped if it wasn't for the cancer? Probably. But my hormonal disadvantage made the decision less difficult for me"
Personally, I am expecting a completely candid admission with a few bombshells thrown in to smokescreen a little. Call me naive but his most profitable defence is to tell the whole truth.
His PR advisers will be advising him that there is no viable damage limitation technique left apart from put himself in the brightest spot-light possible and tell the real truth. This will be his advice especially if he has information that will lead back to the UCI. One of the best bits about this approach is that some of the stuff that we have read in the media is bound to be factually inaccurate so LA will have the chance to be truthful but also to create enough of a fact haze to begin to win over some of the public enough to perhaps invest in his next book etc etc.
The key thing for LA to achieve is to humanise himself in a morally decent way. The long period of silence since the main story broke has served two purposes. Firstly (as myself and several others mentioned up thread) it will allow him to move his wealth to the small number of countries that do not have tax treaties with the USA in order to minimise his losses should he find himself in court against the US Government. Secondly, his silence has given the public enough time to demonise him to the point that within reason, any sort of admission is going to improve the perception that the public has of him.
-
• #3734
He's still a cunt though.
-
• #3736
Major fuck up on Pointless on Challenge TV right now - they had to answer people who had won the TdF, and LA was permitted as an answer. Poor show.
-
• #3737
We are through the looking glass now; ITV are trailing an exclusive interview with Emma O'Reilly on Daybreak
-
• #3738
Lance Armstrong special now on Talksport. Daniel Friebe & Scott Mercier
-
• #3739
^^^ Possible [strike]repost[/strike] repeat?
-
• #3740
Richard Moore now on tomorrow night on Talksport, Scott Mercier interview over ran. Check listings Danny Kelly show between 7-10pm
-
• #3741
^^^ Possible [strike]repost[/strike] repeat?
this is live & direct. -
• #3742
What's live and direct? I was replying to knightlancer's post.
Also, ESPN's Rick Reilly doesn't much appreciate Armstrong's emailed apology: It's all about the lies
-
• #3743
Wiggo's opinion stolen from Popbitch:
* When asked about Lance Armstrong, answered "If anyone is wearing one of those yellow cock-rings, I am coming and tearing it off!"
-
• #3744
Well, here we go...
-
• #3745
who's up, what are you saying fam!
-
• #3746
Were you up for Portillo?
-
• #3747
Damn server lag.
This is worth watching isn't it?
-
• #3748
This is the moon landing for our generation!
What an absolute tool.
-
• #3749
"Not since 2005" I don't buy it.
-
• #3750
I'm flattered to be considered part of Hats' generation.
That doesn't look anything like Wiggins.