-
• #85377
whoahh, until you mentioned it, i hadn't even noticed... Damn my Bad
don't know how i could have missed that.... Dat sneaky shady snatch
Don't be such a disgusting twat please. Probably not a great turn of phrase, but it's pretty fitting. If you weren't in Canada I'd get my sister to come and kick your head in. I'm glad you live in Canada, you should be too. Keep your sexist objectification of some woman you don't know to yourself.
I'd ask how you would feel if people passed comment and judged you based solely on your appearance, but having read a small amount of what you have written, you would come across better than if you were viewed on your appearance alone. Just. Your clothes and bikes are disgusting, and it looks like you have a small penis. And you probably prematurely ejaculate, which leads you to post banal, 'edgy' quasi-urban drivel on cycle forums as it is the only way you can stop yourself from adjaculating within six seconds. So you sit at your computer, miserably cry wanking to photos of women in cycle clothing, undressing them in your mind, staring so hard at their genitals that you start to see things that aren't there, periodically smashing caps lock in time with your sobs, until you finally come to a shuddering, ejaculate-free climax. You then wipe up your tears, place your tiny member back in your courier shorts, Great for the Grind y'all, post some stupid youtube video, and then go and fuck with your awful bars on your on your awful bikes.
It's your choice if you don't want to wash your clothes, post drivel for all to see, build mind-bendingly ugly bikes which are set up badly just for attention and aggressively capitalize everything you spew, and I really don't mind if that is what you want to do, but it is not acceptable to be commenting on women's appearance on public forums.
-
• #85378
Or ever.
-
• #85379
I always wondered why skrtluv was tolerated in this forum.
I guess he isn't.
-
• #85380
n/a
-
• #85381
Don't be such a disgusting twat please. Probably not a great turn of phrase, but it's pretty fitting. If you weren't in Canada I'd get my sister to come and kick your head in. I'm glad you live in Canada, you should be too. Keep your sexist objectification of some woman you don't know to yourself.
I'd ask how you would feel if people passed comment and judged you based solely on your appearance, but having read a small amount of what you have written, you would come across better than if you were viewed on your appearance alone. Just. Your clothes and bikes are disgusting, and it looks like you have a small penis. And you probably prematurely ejaculate, which leads you to post banal, 'edgy' quasi-urban drivel on cycle forums as it is the only way you can stop yourself from adjaculating within six seconds. So you sit at your computer, miserably cry wanking to photos of women in cycle clothing, undressing them in your mind, staring so hard at their genitals that you start to see things that aren't there, periodically smashing caps lock in time with your sobs, until you finally come to a shuddering, ejaculate-free climax. You then wipe up your tears, place your tiny member back in your courier shorts, Great for the Grind y'all, post some stupid youtube video, and then go and fuck with your awful bars on your on your awful bikes.
It's your choice if you don't want to wash your clothes, post drivel for all to see, build mind-bendingly ugly bikes which are set up badly just for attention and aggressively capitalize everything you spew, and I really don't mind if that is what you want to do, but it is not acceptable to be commenting on women's appearance on public forums.
Well said.
-
• #85382
As its '81 I think its a 'Treviso', made of Columbus SL. Montello used SLX (which was introduced in 1984) and became their new top end model.
Hey, thanks! I am quite sure mine is a Montello, It has the SLX decal and all, but with this uncommon features.
-
• #85383
pron?
eimei njs build
rychtarski build
2 Attachments
-
• #85384
Nope.
And please post your own bikes in a suitable thread. -
• #85385
why cant we post our own bikes? all the bikes posted here belong to someone....
-
• #85386
Because 10 out of 10 times they look gash?
Yours have potential - but the photos and saddle look utterly horrid.
-
• #85387
why cant we post our own bikes?
You can. It's just a dick thing to do.
-
• #85388
haha ok fair enough they are with iphone. Why does everyone hate brooks saddles so much??
-
• #85389
ok noted
-
• #85390
Brooks saddles...they just aren't things of true beauty, although I can't deny their awesomeness. They don't have a place on a track bike though, really, do they?*
- I have one on mine, I confess, I thought I could pull it off, I was wrong.
- I have one on mine, I confess, I thought I could pull it off, I was wrong.
-
• #85391
i dunno really I quite like how they look. Also many old track bikes you see have brooks saddles or similar riveted leather ones.. I think a flite evo would definitely be better on the lopro.
-
• #85393
cos you might get offended when someone tells you that -
the slack chain looks shit
the QR skewer looks shit
the brooks looks shit on a track bike (shit full stop IMHO, but I appreciate I am in a minority on this one).
the non-matching tyres look shit
the frame looks ok but nothing special
the front end looks shit (and you'll bash your hands on the tyres when you turn a corner.)
the saddle angle looks shit
you can't even get the bar tape to look vaguely symmetrical.
-
• #85394
the front end looks shit (and you'll bash your hands on the tyres when you turn a corner.)
If your bars turn relative to the front tyre, you have bigger problems than having the hooks below the top of the wheel.
Are you equally concerned about Emma Pooley's set up?
1 Attachment
-
• #85395
If your bars turn relative to the front tyre, you have bigger problems than having the hooks below the top of the wheel.
Are you equally concerned about Emma Pooley's set up?
+1
-
• #85396
lol @ hands bashing tyres
-
• #85397
Don't be such a disgusting twat please. Probably not a great turn of phrase, but it's pretty fitting. If you weren't in Canada I'd get my sister to come and kick your head in. I'm glad you live in Canada, you should be too. Keep your sexist objectification of some woman you don't know to yourself.
I'd ask how you would feel if people passed comment and judged you based solely on your appearance, but having read a small amount of what you have written, you would come across better than if you were viewed on your appearance alone. Just. Your clothes and bikes are disgusting, and it looks like you have a small penis. And you probably prematurely ejaculate, which leads you to post banal, 'edgy' quasi-urban drivel on cycle forums as it is the only way you can stop yourself from adjaculating within six seconds. So you sit at your computer, miserably cry wanking to photos of women in cycle clothing, undressing them in your mind, staring so hard at their genitals that you start to see things that aren't there, periodically smashing caps lock in time with your sobs, until you finally come to a shuddering, ejaculate-free climax. You then wipe up your tears, place your tiny member back in your courier shorts, Great for the Grind y'all, post some stupid youtube video, and then go and fuck with your awful bars on your on your awful bikes.
It's your choice if you don't want to wash your clothes, post drivel for all to see, build mind-bendingly ugly bikes which are set up badly just for attention and aggressively capitalize everything you spew, and I really don't mind if that is what you want to do, but it is not acceptable to be commenting on women's appearance on public forums.
This is what I was trying to say, but couldn't put so well.
-
• #85398
you'll bash your hands on the tyres when you turn a corner
epic fail
-
• #85399
bigtime
-
• #85400
either that, or mega loose headset.
As its '81 I think its a 'Treviso', made of Columbus SL. Montello used SLX (which was introduced in 1984) and became their new top end model.