-
• #69127
it's not allowed to post your own bike in bikeporn!
have a look at the current projects forum for posting your own bike! -
• #69128
Tester has Nike shoes ?
-
• #69129
Photo belongs in "Fort Owners - Assemble"
ftfy
Tester had Nike shoes ?
ftfy
Pic is from 2006 -
• #69130
^ The remains are of PLUM, not OLMO. Close! :P
i sort of figured that out, my point was the decals are confusing as they look like both.
but thanks for your input
-
• #69131
the decals are confusing as they look like both
Apart from the huge gap between L and M and the lack of space on the down tube for the second O in Olmo
-
• #69132
-
• #69134
I went to the opening of the Velobici shop yesterday, and they had some real nice bike porn up on the walls. Sorry about all the dodgy phone pics.
-
• #69135
-
• #69136
-
• #69137
-
• #69138
-
• #69139
-
• #69140
You can't see it on the photo, but the orange 'Nago had the full Colnago pantographed groupset, and the cherry red one had a Colnago panto'd stem and a pristene Concor Profil. Gorgeous bikes, shame for them to be on the walls though.
-
• #69141
Also, it appears to have double posted everything. Not sure why that's happened. Sorry!
-
• #69143
-
• #69144
-
• #69145
Too bad his pedal is upside down.
-
• #69146
Wow. That is ugly. I dig the kickstand though, very bold.
TT steez in a manageable road shape. With a kickstand! Whats not to like!
-
• #69147
-
• #69148
mad stays, very cool. I like the saddle rail colour match
-
• #69149
Sofa seat.
Awful seat post that wont go under low bridges.
Ugly tyres.
Bean can head tube.
Mess of a drive train.Nope.
-
• #69150
^ Nice shiny rims though.
My SL3. Practising with my SLR. Trying to blur the background with a 55mm lens is not easy! Decent result, I'm happy.