Bike porn

Posted on
Page
of 4,156
First Prev
/ 4,156
Last Next
  • ace paintjob there

  • OMG YES! that rig is serious!

  • OMG YES! that rig is serious!

    Repost though. But a good one :)

  • epic bike... (but I do think it would look better a few sizes up)..

  • So awesome. It's nice to see smaller bikes that look nice.

    I ride a 53 and they all look melty as fuck :(

  • Am I missing something? It's a fucking disaster according to my eyes.
    But I think 53-54 is the ideal size for round steel tubed bikes - spindly head tubes aren't my thing. Aero tubed stuff needs a bit more breathing room, you don't want the bottom of the top tube meeting the top of the down tube before the head tube.
    like this - notporndisclaimer:

    ugh that's melty

    spot on, and that's about a 53-4

    Not quite sure wtf I'm talking about.
    oh well.

  • I think around 56 is probably the right size for porn.

  • I think 58 ctc square is the perfect size for a skinny steel bike....

  • I think 58 ctc square is the perfect size for a skinny steel bike....

    BBB Thread >>>>>>>>>>>

  • <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

    62cm+ goes to BBB

  • 58 don't cut it in there....

  • Is there a midget bike thread?

  • Probably not, because they're mostly gross.

  • I didn't say midget porn, you sick man.

  • no the other version

  • there's a home for that as well....

  • you don't want the bottom of the top tube meeting the top of the down tube before the head tube.

    Bollocks, in both senses of the term.

  • Cheers TM!!

  • Bollocks, in both senses of the term.

    Well, it makes sense structurally and aerodynamically but that's not important is it? pft.

  • Not quite sure wtf I'm talking about.

    .

  • should be all sram

  • I see where you get your name ;)

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Bike porn

Posted by Avatar for Velocio @Velocio

Actions